Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using the Rank Equity Index to measure emergency medicine faculty rank progression.
Hobgood, Cherri; Fassiotto, Magali.
Afiliação
  • Hobgood C; Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  • Fassiotto M; Office of Faculty Development and Diversity, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Acad Emerg Med ; 28(9): 966-973, 2021 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33909327
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Faculty diversity is a high-priority goal for academic emergency medicine (EM). Most administrators currently monitor faculty diversity using aggregate data, which may obscure underrepresentation by rank. We apply the Rank Equity Index (REI) to EM faculty data to assess rank progression.

METHODS:

We calculated the REI (% faculty cohort higher rank/% faculty cohort lower rank) for EM faculty. We performed REI analyses by faculty gender (women, men) and race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic/Latinx, Asian). We compared professor/assistant professor, professor/associate professor, and associate professor/assistant professor to establish rank parity for gender and race/ethnicity. Parity is an REI of 1.0.

RESULTS:

REI analysis by gender demonstrates that women faculty did not achieve parity at any rank comparison in any study year. REI analysis by race/ethnicity demonstrates that all faculty of color are below parity at the assistant to associate professor promotion. Latinx faculty are at parity for associate professor to professor, but Asian and Black faculty do not achieve parity in any comparison. Intersecting gender and race/ethnicity in the REI analysis demonstrates that Asian women have the lowest REIs among all faculty ranks and races/ethnicities. Men of all races/ethnicities achieved parity in two of three rank comparisons, except for Black men, who did not achieve parity in any comparison.

CONCLUSIONS:

REI analysis demonstrates EM women faculty and faculty of color are not achieving rank parity and are disadvantaged at the first tier of promotion. A preliminary longitudinal trend analysis suggests little progress. Asian women and Black men experience the most rank inequity. REI analysis identifies a need for focused faculty development to enhance our most vulnerable faculty's rank progression, suggesting that targeted recruitment and retention efforts of women faculty of all races/ethnicities and faculty of color, in particular, will improve diversity at every tier of faculty rank.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina de Emergência / Docentes de Medicina Aspecto: Equity_inequality Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Acad Emerg Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina de Emergência / Docentes de Medicina Aspecto: Equity_inequality Limite: Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Acad Emerg Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article