Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
E-diary use in clinical headache practice: A prospective observational study.
van Casteren, Daphne S; Verhagen, Iris E; de Boer, Irene; de Vries Lentsch, Simone; Fronczek, Rolf; van Zwet, Erik W; MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette; Terwindt, Gisela M.
Afiliação
  • van Casteren DS; Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Verhagen IE; Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • de Boer I; Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • de Vries Lentsch S; Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Fronczek R; Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • van Zwet EW; Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • MaassenVanDenBrink A; Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Terwindt GM; Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cephalalgia ; 41(11-12): 1161-1171, 2021 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33938248
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To determine whether our E-diary can be used to diagnose migraine and provide more reliable migraine-related frequency numbers compared to patients' self-reported estimates.

METHODS:

We introduced a self-developed E-diary including automated algorithms differentiating headache and migraine days, indicating whether a patient has migraine. Reliability of the E-diary diagnosis in combination with two previously validated E-questionnaires was compared to a physician's diagnosis as gold standard in headache patients referred to the Leiden Headache Clinic (n = 596). In a subset of patients with migraine (n = 484), self-estimated migraine-related frequencies were compared to diary-based results.

RESULTS:

The first migraine screening approach including an E-headache questionnaire, and the E-diary revealed a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 17%. In the second approach, an E-migraine questionnaire was added, resulting in a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 69%. Mean self-estimated monthly migraine days, non-migrainous headache days and days with acute medication use were different from E-diary-based results (absolute mean difference ± standard deviation respectively 4.7 ± 5.0, 6.2 ± 6.6 and 4.3 ± 4.8).

CONCLUSION:

The E-diary including algorithms differentiating headache and migraine days showed usefulness in diagnosing migraine. The use emphasised the need for E-diaries to obtain reliable information, as patients do not reliably recall numbers of migraine days and acute medication intake. Adding E-diaries will be helpful in future headache telemedicine.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cefaleia / Transtornos de Enxaqueca Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cephalalgia Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cefaleia / Transtornos de Enxaqueca Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cephalalgia Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article