Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery.
Khandelwal, Ankur; Chaturvedi, Arvind; Sokhal, Navdeep; Singh, Akanksha; Sharma, Hanjabam Barun.
Afiliação
  • Khandelwal A; Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Sharda University School of Medical Sciences and Research, Greater Noida, India.
  • Chaturvedi A; Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Sokhal N; Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Singh A; Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • Sharma HB; Department of Physiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India Study.
Asian Spine J ; 16(2): 183-194, 2022 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34000799
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

This was a double-blind randomized study.

PURPOSE:

The primary purpose was to compare the effects of propofol and ketofol on amplitudes and latencies of transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) during thoracolumbar spine surgery. In addition, intraoperative hemodynamics and muscle power were compared. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE Propofol is commonly used during intraoperative TcMEP monitoring. However, propofol inhibits TcMEP amplitudes and causes hypotension in a dose-dependent fashion.

METHODS:

Amplitude and latency of TcMEPs were recorded bilaterally from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor hallucis (AH) muscles in 38 adult American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery. Baseline recordings of TcMEPs in both groups were recorded under propofol infusion. Group X patients then received propofol and fentanyl (1 mcg/kg/hr), and group Y patients received ketofol and fentanyl (1 mcg/kg/hr). Bispectral index was maintained at 40-60 in both groups. Amplitude and latency were recorded at 30 minutes intervals for 2 hours.

RESULTS:

Propofol caused no significant changes in amplitude and latency in any muscle. In contrast, amplitude increased significantly at all time points in the bilateral APB muscles and 60, 90, and 120 minutes in the left AH muscle without changes in latency in response to ketofol. When the two groups were compared, ketofol induced significantly higher amplitudes at 60, 90, and 120 minutes in the (left) APB, at all time points in the (right) APB, and at 120 minutes in both AH muscles, compared with propofol. Blood pressures were lower and fluid and vasopressor requirements were higher in group X. Muscle power was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Ketofol facilitates TcMEP amplitudes without affecting latency. Use of ketofol resulted in a better and more stable hemodynamic profile than did use of propofol.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Asian Spine J Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Asian Spine J Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article