Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the i-STAT Alinity v in a veterinary clinical setting.
Burke, Jasper E; Nguyen, Thuy Hien T; Davis, Tanya; Koenig, Amie; Lane, Selena L; Good, Jennifer; Brainard, Benjamin M.
Afiliação
  • Burke JE; Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
  • Nguyen THT; Zoetis Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.
  • Davis T; Zoetis Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.
  • Koenig A; Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
  • Lane SL; Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
  • Good J; Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
  • Brainard BM; Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 33(4): 703-710, 2021 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34047216
ABSTRACT
Many point-of-care (POC) analyzers are available for the measurement of electrolytes and acid-base status in animals. We assessed the precision of the i-STAT Alinity v, a recently introduced POC analyzer, and compared it to 2 commonly used and previously validated POC analyzers (i-STAT 1, Stat Profile pHOx Ultra). Precision was evaluated by performing multiple analyses of whole blood samples from healthy dogs, cats, and horses on multiple i-STAT Alinity v analyzers. For comparison between analyzers, whole blood samples from dogs and cats presented to the emergency room were run concurrently on all 3 POC instruments. Reported values were compared by species (dogs and cats only) using Pearson correlation, and all values from all species were analyzed together for the Bland-Altman analysis. Results suggested that the i-STAT Alinity v precision was very good, with median coefficients of variability <2.5% for all measured parameters (except the anion gap), with variable ranges of coefficients of variation. In addition, good-to-excellent correlation was observed between the i-STAT Alinity v and i-STAT 1, and between the i-STAT Alinity v and Stat Profile pHOx Ultra for all parameters in both cats and dogs, respectively. In this cohort, the i-STAT Alinity v had clinically acceptable bias compared to the currently marketed analyzers and can be used for monitoring measured analytes in cats and dogs, although serial measurements in a single animal should be performed on the same analyzer whenever possible.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gasometria / Gatos / Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito / Cães / Eletrólitos / Cavalos Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Vet Diagn Invest Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gasometria / Gatos / Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito / Cães / Eletrólitos / Cavalos Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Vet Diagn Invest Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article