Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of a conventional volumetric-modulated arc therapy knowledge-based planning model applied to the new Halcyon© O-ring linac in locoregional breast cancer radiotherapy.
Costa, Emilie; Richir, Thomas; Robilliard, Magalie; Bragard, Christel; Logerot, Christelle; Kirova, Youlia; Fourquet, Alain; De Marzi, Ludovic.
Afiliação
  • Costa E; Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France. Electronic address: emilie.costa@curie.fr.
  • Richir T; Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.
  • Robilliard M; Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.
  • Bragard C; Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.
  • Logerot C; Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.
  • Kirova Y; Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.
  • Fourquet A; Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.
  • De Marzi L; Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France; Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm LITO, Orsay, France.
Phys Med ; 86: 32-43, 2021 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34051551
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a knowledge-based planning (KBP) model for breast cancer trained on plans performed on a conventional linac with 6 MV FF (flattening filter) beams and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for plans performed on the new jawless Halcyon© system with 6 MV FFF (flattening filter-free) beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the RapidPlan© (RP) KBP optimization engine, a DVH Estimation Model was first trained using 56 VMAT left-sided breast cancer treatment plans performed on a conventional linac, and validated on another 20 similar cases (without manual intervention). To determine the capacity of the model for Halcyon©, an additional cohort of 20 left-sided breast cancer plans was generated with RP and analyzed for both TrueBeam© and Halcyon© machines. Plan qualities between manual vs RP (followed by manual intervention) Halcyon© plans set were compared qualitatively by blinded review by radiation oncologists for 10 new independent plans. RESULTS: Halcyon© plans generated with the VMAT model trained with conventional linac plans showed comparable target dose distribution compared to TrueBeam© plans. Organ sparingwas comparable between the 2 devices with a slight decrease in heart dose for Halcyon© plans. Nine out of ten automatically generated Halcyon© plans were preferentially chosen by the radiation oncologists over the manually generated Halcyon© plans. CONCLUSION: A VMAT KBP model driven by plans performed on a conventional linac with 6 MV FF beams provides high quality plans performed with 6 MV FFF beams on the new Halcyon© linac.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Phys Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Phys Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article