Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analyzing the learning curves of a novice and an experienced urologist for transrectal magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
Cata, Emanuel Darius; Van Praet, Charles; Andras, Iulia; Kadula, Pierre; Ognean, Razvan; Buzoianu, Maximilian; Leucuta, Daniel; Caraiani, Cosmin; Tamas-Szora, Attila; Decaestecker, Karel; Coman, Ioan; Crisan, Nicolae.
Afiliação
  • Cata ED; Urology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Van Praet C; Urology Department, Municipal Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Andras I; Urology Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Kadula P; Urology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Ognean R; Urology Department, Municipal Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Buzoianu M; Urology Department, Municipal Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Leucuta D; Urology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Caraiani C; Urology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  • Tamas-Szora A; Medical Informatics and Biostatistics Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
  • Decaestecker K; Medical Imaging Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
  • Coman I; Radiology Department, Municipal Hospital, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
  • Crisan N; Urology Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Transl Androl Urol ; 10(5): 1956-1965, 2021 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34159076
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aim of the current study was to evaluate and compare the learning curves of transrectal magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy for two urologists with different backgrounds (Operator 1 experienced, self-trained and Operator 2 novice, trained by a mentor/MRI reading courses).

METHODS:

A cohort of 400 patients who underwent fusion prostate biopsy in our department was analyzed. The learning curves were assessed in terms of overall and clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) detection rates, percentage of positive biopsy cores/targeted and the percentage of PCa tissue on positive targeted cores.

RESULTS:

Increasing trends were observed for both urologists in terms of all biopsy outcomes during the study time. For the novice urologist, a significant increase was observed for overall PCa detection rate, but not for clinically significant disease (25.44%, P=0.04/15%, P=0.145). Operator 1 showed an increasing diagnosis yield of clinically significant disease up to 104 cases. Similar cancer detection rates were observed when comparing the first and last biopsies performed by both operators. Multivariate analysis adjusted for age, PSA, prostate volume, lesion diameter and PIRADS score showed an increase of PCa detection with 51% for every 52 biopsies performed (P=0.022).

CONCLUSIONS:

When starting with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy, mentoring and prostate magnetic resonance imaging reading training allow a novice urologist to demonstrate a good initial PCa detection rate. After about 52 cases, he reached a stable PCa and clinically significant PCa detection rate, that was similar to that of an experienced urologist.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Transl Androl Urol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Transl Androl Urol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article