Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
QUAREP-LiMi: A community-driven initiative to establish guidelines for quality assessment and reproducibility for instruments and images in light microscopy.
Nelson, Glyn; Boehm, Ulrike; Bagley, Steve; Bajcsy, Peter; Bischof, Johanna; Brown, Claire M; Dauphin, Aurélien; Dobbie, Ian M; Eriksson, John E; Faklaris, Orestis; Fernandez-Rodriguez, Julia; Ferrand, Alexia; Gelman, Laurent; Gheisari, Ali; Hartmann, Hella; Kukat, Christian; Laude, Alex; Mitkovski, Miso; Munck, Sebastian; North, Alison J; Rasse, Tobias M; Resch-Genger, Ute; Schuetz, Lucas C; Seitz, Arne; Strambio-De-Castillia, Caterina; Swedlow, Jason R; Alexopoulos, Ioannis; Aumayr, Karin; Avilov, Sergiy; Bakker, Gert-Jan; Bammann, Rodrigo R; Bassi, Andrea; Beckert, Hannes; Beer, Sebastian; Belyaev, Yury; Bierwagen, Jakob; Birngruber, Konstantin A; Bosch, Manel; Breitlow, Juergen; Cameron, Lisa A; Chalfoun, Joe; Chambers, James J; Chen, Chieh-Li; Conde-Sousa, Eduardo; Corbett, Alexander D; Cordelieres, Fabrice P; Nery, Elaine Del; Dietzel, Ralf; Eismann, Frank; Fazeli, Elnaz.
Afiliação
  • Nelson G; Bioimaging Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Boehm U; Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, USA.
  • Bagley S; Visualisation, Irradiation & Analysis, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, UK.
  • Bajcsy P; National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
  • Bischof J; Euro-BioImaging, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Brown CM; Advanced BioImaging Facility (ABIF), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Dauphin A; Unité Génétique et Biologie du Développement U934, PICT-IBiSA, Institut Curie/Inserm/CNRS/PSL Research University, Paris, France.
  • Dobbie IM; Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxon, UK.
  • Eriksson JE; Turku Bioscience Centre, Euro-Bioimaging ERIC, Turku, Finland.
  • Faklaris O; Biocampus, CNRS UAR 3426, Montpellier, France.
  • Fernandez-Rodriguez J; Centre for Cellular Imaging, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • Ferrand A; Imaging Core Facility, Biozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Gelman L; Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Gheisari A; Light Microscopy Facility, CMCB Technology Platform, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Hartmann H; Light Microscopy Facility, CMCB Technology Platform, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Kukat C; FACS & Imaging Core Facility, Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Cologne, Germany.
  • Laude A; Bioimaging Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Mitkovski M; Light Microscopy Facility, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Goettingen, Germany.
  • Munck S; VIB BioImaging Core & VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research & KU Leuven Department for Neuroscience, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.
  • North AJ; The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA.
  • Rasse TM; Scientific Service Group Microscopy, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
  • Resch-Genger U; Division Biophotonics, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Germany.
  • Schuetz LC; European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Advanced Light Microscopy Facility, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Seitz A; Faculty of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.
  • Strambio-De-Castillia C; Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Swedlow JR; Divisions of Computational Biology and Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
  • Alexopoulos I; General Instrumentation - Light Microscopy Facility, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Aumayr K; BioOptics Facility, IMP - Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria.
  • Avilov S; Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Bakker GJ; Department of Cell Biology (route 283), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Bammann RR; Scientifica Ltd., Uckfield, East Sussex, UK.
  • Bassi A; Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Beckert H; Microscopy Core Facility, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Beer S; Hamamatsu Photonics GmbH, Herrsching, Germany.
  • Belyaev Y; Microscopy Imaging Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Bierwagen J; AHF analysentechnik AG, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Birngruber KA; TOPTICA Photonics AG, Graefelfing, Germany.
  • Bosch M; Faculty of Biology, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Breitlow J; PicoQuant, Berlin, Germany.
  • Cameron LA; Light Microscopy Core Facility, Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
  • Chalfoun J; National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
  • Chambers JJ; Institute for Applied Life Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Chen CL; Pathware, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Conde-Sousa E; i3S - Instituto de InvestigaÇão e InovaÇão em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Corbett AD; INEB - Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Cordelieres FP; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
  • Nery ED; Bordeaux Imaging Center, Bordeaux, Nouvelle Aquitaine, France.
  • Dietzel R; BioPhenics High-Content Screening Laboratory (PICT-IBiSA), Translational Research Department, Institut Curie - PSL Research University, Paris, France.
  • Eismann F; Omicron-Laserage Laserprodukte GmbH, Rodgau, Germany.
  • Fazeli E; Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany.
J Microsc ; 284(1): 56-73, 2021 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34214188
A modern day light microscope has evolved from a tool devoted to making primarily empirical observations to what is now a sophisticated , quantitative device that is an integral part of both physical and life science research. Nowadays, microscopes are found in nearly every experimental laboratory. However, despite their prevalent use in capturing and quantifying scientific phenomena, neither a thorough understanding of the principles underlying quantitative imaging techniques nor appropriate knowledge of how to calibrate, operate and maintain microscopes can be taken for granted. This is clearly demonstrated by the well-documented and widespread difficulties that are routinely encountered in evaluating acquired data and reproducing scientific experiments. Indeed, studies have shown that more than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to repeat another scientist's experiments, while more than half have even failed to reproduce their own experiments. One factor behind the reproducibility crisis of experiments published in scientific journals is the frequent underreporting of imaging methods caused by a lack of awareness and/or a lack of knowledge of the applied technique. Whereas quality control procedures for some methods used in biomedical research, such as genomics (e.g. DNA sequencing, RNA-seq) or cytometry, have been introduced (e.g. ENCODE), this issue has not been tackled for optical microscopy instrumentation and images. Although many calibration standards and protocols have been published, there is a lack of awareness and agreement on common standards and guidelines for quality assessment and reproducibility. In April 2020, the QUality Assessment and REProducibility for instruments and images in Light Microscopy (QUAREP-LiMi) initiative was formed. This initiative comprises imaging scientists from academia and industry who share a common interest in achieving a better understanding of the performance and limitations of microscopes and improved quality control (QC) in light microscopy. The ultimate goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to establish a set of common QC standards, guidelines, metadata models and tools, including detailed protocols, with the ultimate aim of improving reproducible advances in scientific research. This White Paper (1) summarizes the major obstacles identified in the field that motivated the launch of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative; (2) identifies the urgent need to address these obstacles in a grassroots manner, through a community of stakeholders including, researchers, imaging scientists, bioimage analysts, bioimage informatics developers, corporate partners, funding agencies, standards organizations, scientific publishers and observers of such; (3) outlines the current actions of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative and (4) proposes future steps that can be taken to improve the dissemination and acceptance of the proposed guidelines to manage QC. To summarize, the principal goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to improve the overall quality and reproducibility of light microscope image data by introducing broadly accepted standard practices and accurately captured image data metrics.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Microscopia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Microsc Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Microscopia Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Microsc Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article