Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perceived Barriers to Comprehensive Cleft Care Delivery: Results From A Capacity-Building Educational Initiative and Implications.
Kantar, Rami S; Breugem, Corstiaan C; Alfonso, Allyson R; Keith, Kristen; Kassam, Serena; Annan, Beyhan; Chahine, Elsa M; Wasicek, Philip J; Patel, Krishna G; Flores, Roberto L; Hamdan, Usama S.
Afiliação
  • Breugem CC; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Keith K; From the Global Smile Foundation, Norwood, MA.
  • Annan B; From the Global Smile Foundation, Norwood, MA.
  • Chahine EM; From the Global Smile Foundation, Norwood, MA.
  • Wasicek PJ; Department of Surgery, The University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD.
  • Flores RL; The Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York City, NY.
Ann Plast Surg ; 87(2): 194-198, 2021 08 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34253700
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

We analyzed the perceptions of participants and faculty members in simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops regarding comprehensive cleft care delivery in developing countries.

METHODS:

Data were collected from participants and faculty members in 2 simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops organized by Global Smile Foundation. We collected demographic data and surveyed what they believed was the most significant barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery and the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries. We also compared participant and faculty responses.

RESULTS:

The total number of participants and faculty members was 313 from 44 countries. The response rate was 57.8%. The majority reported that the most significant barrier facing the delivery of comprehensive cleft care in developing countries was financial (35.0%), followed by the absence of multidisciplinary cleft teams (30.8%). The majority reported that the most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care was creating multidisciplinary cleft teams (32.2%), followed by providing cleft training (22.6%). We found no significant differences in what participants and faculty perceived as the greatest barrier to comprehensive cleft care delivery (P = 0.46), or most important intervention to deliver comprehensive cleft care in developing countries (P = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study provides an appraisal of barriers facing comprehensive cleft care delivery and interventions required to overcome these barriers in developing countries. Future studies will be critical to validate or refute our findings, as well as determine country-specific roadmaps for delivering comprehensive cleft care to those who need it the most.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fenda Labial / Fissura Palatina Aspecto: Implementation_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Plast Surg Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fenda Labial / Fissura Palatina Aspecto: Implementation_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Plast Surg Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article