Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early antimicrobial prophylaxis in autologous stem cell transplant recipients: Conventional versus an absolute neutrophil count-driven approach.
Horowitz, Justin G; Gawrys, Gerard W; Lee, Grace C; Ramirez, Brittney A; Elledge, Carole M; Shaughnessy, Paul J.
Afiliação
  • Horowitz JG; Department of Pharmacy Services, Methodist Healthcare System, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • Gawrys GW; College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
  • Lee GC; Department of Pharmacy Services, Methodist Healthcare System, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  • Ramirez BA; College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
  • Elledge CM; College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
  • Shaughnessy PJ; Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 23(4): e13689, 2021 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34255395
BACKGROUND: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients are at increased risk of developing life-threatening infections. There is discordance in published recommendations for timing of pre- and post-transplant antimicrobial prophylaxis in this patient population, and these recommendations are unsubstantiated by any published comparative analyses. METHODS: An observational, pre- and post-intervention study of consecutive autologous HSCT recipients was conducted over a 2-year period. In the pre-intervention cohort, antimicrobial prophylaxis was initiated on the day prior to transplant. In the post-intervention cohort, antimicrobials were initiated once absolute neutrophil count (ANC) reached ≤500 cells/mm3 . The primary outcome assessed was frequency of febrile occurrences. Secondary outcomes included total days of prophylaxis, positive blood cultures, all-cause mortality, Clostridioides difficile infection rates, and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients were included in the final analysis, with 105 and 103 patients in the pre- and post-intervention cohorts, respectively. The majority of patients included were male. Lower rates of fever occurrences were observed in the post-intervention cohort (83% pre- vs. 69% post-intervention; p = 0.019). A significant reduction in the mean antibacterial days per patient was identified (9.7 vs. 4.6 days; p < 0.001). Other than lower rates of febrile neutropenia in the post-intervention cohort, no differences were identified in secondary outcomes. In multivariable analyses, ANC-driven prophylaxis was independently associated with decreased febrile events. CONCLUSIONS: Delaying prophylaxis until severe neutropenia was not associated with increased febrile events or other secondary clinical outcomes evaluated. This approach is associated with a significant reduction in antimicrobial exposure.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas / Anti-Infecciosos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Transpl Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas / Anti-Infecciosos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Transpl Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article