Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Individual-risk-score for urinary tract malignancy in patients with microscopic hematuria.
Sanci, Adem; Özkaya, Mehmet Fatih; Kubilay, Eralp; Gokce, Mehmet Ilker; Süer, Evren; Gülpinar, Omer; Baltaci, Sumer; Turkolmez, Kadir.
Afiliação
  • Sanci A; Faculty of Medicine, Urology Department, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Özkaya MF; Faculty of Medicine, Urology Department, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Kubilay E; Faculty of Medicine, Urology Department, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Gokce MI; Faculty of Medicine, Urology Department, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Süer E; Faculty of Medicine, Urology Department, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Gülpinar O; Faculty of Medicine, Urology Department, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Baltaci S; Faculty of Medicine, Urology Department, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Turkolmez K; Faculty of Medicine, Urology Department, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(10): e14662, 2021 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34322953
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To determine the patients who can be safely exempted from undergoing unnecessary diagnostic procedures for microscopic hematuria (MH) evaluation by using the developed individual-risk-scoring system. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The patients who underwent a complete urological evaluation for MH were identified retrospectively. The risk factors for urinary malignancy which defined in the 2020 American Urological Association/Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction guidelines were recorded for each patient. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to establish a predictive risk-scoring system. The odds ratios obtained as a result of the logistic regression analysis were scored.

RESULTS:

A total of 1461 patients who had undergone a complete urological evaluation for MH were identified. The urinary malignancy rate was 3.4% (50 of the 1461 patients). According to the odds ratios, age >40 was calculated as 1 point; male gender, 2 points; smoking history, 4 points; presence of occupational risk factor, 1 point; and presence of macroscopic hematuria, 2 points. For the cut-off risk score, 5 points was found to be the most appropriate score according to the sensitivity and specificity levels. The patients with risk scores of 5 points or lower were considered to be in the low-risk group for urinary tract malignancy.

CONCLUSION:

The patients with a risk score of 5 points or above require complete urological evaluation. The results of the present study may reduce the number of patients undergoing unnecessary urological evaluation.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Urológicas / Hematúria Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Clin Pract Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Urológicas / Hematúria Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Clin Pract Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article