Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Orthodontic clinicians' attitudes and knowledge of dentogingival aesthetics: A cross-sectional survey of BOS members.
Ajrash, Eman; DiBiase, Andrew T; Pandis, Nikolaos; Cobourne, Martyn T; Seehra, Jadbinder.
Afiliação
  • Ajrash E; Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • DiBiase AT; Department of Orthodontics, Maxillofacial Unit, William Harvey Hospital, Willesborough, Ashford, UK.
  • Pandis N; Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Dental School/Medical Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Cobourne MT; Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Seehra J; Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
J Orthod ; 50(4): 400-409, 2023 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34378445
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess orthodontic clinicians' knowledge and attitudes towards dentogingival aesthetics and to explore characteristics that predict the knowledge of dentogingival aesthetics.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional questionnaire.

SETTING:

On-line survey of members of the British Orthdontic Society. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

An 11-item online questionnaire was sent to orthodontic practitioners for completion. The questionnaire covered respondent demographics and questions relating to both knowledge and attitudes towards dentogingival aesthetics (six parameters). Descriptive statistics were calculated for study characteristics and summary values for the survey items. Responses to the eight knowledge-based questions were converted to a binary outcome (correct and incorrect answer). The maximum score that could be achieved was eight. Multivariable modelling was used in order to examine associations between the study characteristics and the aggregate score.

RESULTS:

A total of 252 responses were obtained resulting in a response rate of 17%. Within this cohort, the respondents were primarily women (52.8%) and aged 30-40 years (35.7%). The mean score for the eight knowledge-based questions was 3.8 ± 1.8 (range = 0-8). Knowledge of the ideal gingival margin position of the anterior teeth was high (92.4%). Knowledge of the other five dentogingival aesthetic parameters was variable. In the multivariable analysis, lower knowledge scores were predicated by respondents who did not have a special interest in dental aesthetics (-0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.01 to -0.07; P = 0.02), who could not recall attending courses, lectures or seminars on dental aesthetics in the past five years (-0.80; 95% CI = -1.43 to -0.17; P = 0.01) and with increasing age (-0.43; 95% CI = -0.62 to -0.23; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Knowledge of ideal dentogingival parameters is generally suboptimal among orthodontists in the UK. The reported lack of knowledge of the ideal dentogingival parameters may also influence respondents' attitudes towards the importance of dentogingival aesthetics. Further teaching or courses related to dentogingival aesthetics is desired by orthodontic clinicians.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ortodontia Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Orthod Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ortodontia Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Orthod Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article