Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving diagnostic performance through feedback: the Diagnosis Learning Cycle.
Fernandez Branson, Carolina; Williams, Michelle; Chan, Teresa M; Graber, Mark L; Lane, Kathleen P; Grieser, Skip; Landis-Lewis, Zach; Cooke, James; Upadhyay, Divvy K; Mondoux, Shawn; Singh, Hardeep; Zwaan, Laura; Friedman, Charles; Olson, Andrew P J.
Afiliação
  • Fernandez Branson C; School of Communication Writing and the Arts, Metropolitan State University, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
  • Williams M; Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Chan TM; Emergency Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Graber ML; Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Lane KP; Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Grieser S; Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  • Landis-Lewis Z; Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Cooke J; Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Upadhyay DK; Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Mondoux S; Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Singh H; Emergency Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Zwaan L; Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Friedman C; Institute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Olson APJ; Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 30(12): 1002-1009, 2021 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34417335
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Errors in reasoning are a common cause of diagnostic error. However, it is difficult to improve performance partly because providers receive little feedback on diagnostic performance. Examining means of providing consistent feedback and enabling continuous improvement may provide novel insights for diagnostic performance.

METHODS:

We developed a model for improving diagnostic performance through feedback using a six-step qualitative research process, including a review of existing models from within and outside of medicine, a survey, semistructured interviews with individuals working in and outside of medicine, the development of the new model, an interdisciplinary consensus meeting, and a refinement of the model.

RESULTS:

We applied theory and knowledge from other fields to help us conceptualise learning and comparison and translate that knowledge into an applied diagnostic context. This helped us develop a model, the Diagnosis Learning Cycle, which illustrates the need for clinicians to be given feedback about both their confidence and reasoning in a diagnosis and to be able to seamlessly compare diagnostic hypotheses and outcomes. This information would be stored in a repository to allow accessibility. Such a process would standardise diagnostic feedback and help providers learn from their practice and improve diagnostic performance. This model adds to existing models in diagnosis by including a detailed picture of diagnostic reasoning and the elements required to improve outcomes and calibration.

CONCLUSION:

A consistent, standard programme of feedback that includes representations of clinicians' confidence and reasoning is a common element in non-medical fields that could be applied to medicine. Adapting this approach to diagnosis in healthcare is a promising next step. This information must be stored reliably and accessed consistently. The next steps include testing the Diagnosis Learning Cycle in clinical settings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção à Saúde Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Qual Saf Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção à Saúde Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Qual Saf Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article