Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Swab Based Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection and Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Tertiary Care Hospital.
Singh, Arpana; Gupta, Pratima; Mathuria, Yogendra P; Kalita, Deepjyoti; Prasad, Amber; Panda, Prasan K; Bahurupi, Yogesh; Sahoo, Biswajeet; Omar, Balram Ji.
Afiliação
  • Singh A; Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
  • Gupta P; Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
  • Mathuria YP; Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
  • Kalita D; Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
  • Prasad A; Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
  • Panda PK; General Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
  • Bahurupi Y; Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
  • Sahoo B; Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
  • Omar BJ; Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Cureus ; 13(7): e16785, 2021 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34513392
PURPOSE: To assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the GenBody COVID-19 Antigen kit (GenBody Inc., Cheonan, South Korea) available in the market with the gold standard reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS: Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were collected from suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and tested by RT-PCR and GenBody Rapid antigen kit. Performance characteristic of the antigen kit was calculated. RESULTS: We tested nasopharyngeal swabs and oropharyngeal swabs (n=240). Amongst the 102 positive RT-PCR samples, the rapid antigen test detected 36 as positive, showing an overall sensitivity of 35.3%. All the samples detected positive with the antigen rapid test were also detected positive by RT-PCR. CONCLUSION: The performance of the rapid antigen kit was good with respect to high viral load samples, whereas those with lower levels were missed. Unfortunately, the overall low sensitivity of the antigen kit does not allow using it alone as the frontline testing kit for COVID-19 diagnosis.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article