Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comfort Measures Only Checklist for Critical Care Providers: Impact on Satisfaction and Symptom Management.
Matone, Emily; Verosky, Denise; Siedsma, Matthew; O'Kane, Erica N; Ren, Dianxu; Harlan, Melissa D; Tuite, Patricia K.
Afiliação
  • Matone E; Author Affiliations: University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing (Dr Matone); Clinical Director (Mrs Verosky), Supportive and Palliative Care, UPMC Mercy Hospital (retired), Pittsburgh; Clinical Assistant Professor (Dr Siedsma), Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Intensivist (Dr Siedsma) and Critical Care Fellow (Dr O'Kane), Geisinger Medical Center, Pennsylvania; Associate Professor and Associate Director for Statistical Support (Dr Ren), Universit
Clin Nurse Spec ; 35(6): 303-313, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34606210
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This quality improvement project created a guide for critical care providers transitioning patients to comfort measures only encouraging communication, collaboration, and shared decision making; ensuring management of patients' end-of-life symptoms and needs; and enhancing provider satisfaction by improving structure and consistency when transitioning patients. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT Interviews conducted with staff in intensive care units revealed opportunities to improve structure and processes of transitioning patients at the end of life. A subcommittee of experts designed a checklist to facilitate interdisciplinary conversations. Impact on provider satisfaction and symptom management was assessed. Presurveys circulated used a Research Electronic Data Capture tool. A checklist was implemented for 3 months, and then postsurveys were sent. Charts were audited to identify improvement in symptom management and compared with retrospective samples.

OUTCOMES:

Clinical improvements were seen in communication (12%), collaboration (25%), shared decision making (22%), and order entry time (17%). In addition, 72% agreed the checklist improved structure and consistency; 69% reported improved communication, collaboration, and shared decision making; 61% felt it improved knowledge/understanding of patient needs; and 69% agreed it improved management of patient symptoms.

CONCLUSION:

After checklist implementation, staff felt more involved and more comfortable, and reported more clarity in transitioning patients; no improvement in patient outcomes was realized.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Satisfação Pessoal / Lista de Checagem / Enfermagem de Cuidados Críticos / Conforto do Paciente / Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Nurse Spec Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Satisfação Pessoal / Lista de Checagem / Enfermagem de Cuidados Críticos / Conforto do Paciente / Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Nurse Spec Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article