Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bedside clinical tests to assess sensitization in office workers with chronic neck pain.
Nunes, Alexandre; Arendt-Nielsen, Lars; Espanha, Margarida; Teles, Júlia; Moita, João; Petersen, Kristian Kjær.
Afiliação
  • Nunes A; Biomechanics and Functional Morphology Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana da Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz-Quebrada, Portugal.
  • Arendt-Nielsen L; Escola Superior de Saúde Jean Piaget do Algarve, Portugal.
  • Espanha M; SMI, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Health and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Teles J; Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Department of Halth Science and Technology, School of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Moita J; Biomechanics and Functional Morphology Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana da Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz-Quebrada, Portugal.
  • Petersen KK; Biomechanics and Functional Morphology Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana da Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz-Quebrada, Portugal.
Somatosens Mot Res ; 38(4): 357-365, 2021 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34635001
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to assess pain sensitization in individual office workers with chronic neck pain through simple bedside quantitative sensory tests (QST) and to associate the findings with pain intensity and pain catastrophizing.

METHODS:

One hundred-and-four office workers with chronic neck pain were assessed using pressure pain threshold (PPT) considering pain sensitive if PPTs were lower than 155 kPa in the upper trapezius and 245 kPa in the tibialis anterior. Pain sensitive to temporal summation of pain (TSP) was considered if there was a difference of two points in the visual analogue scale (VAS) comparing the first and last stimulus. Pain sensitive was considered to conditioned pain modulation (CPM) if the CPM-effect was less than -7.5%. Pain intensity and catastrophizing were measured using VAS and with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale.

RESULTS:

There was at least one pain sensitive QST finding in 66 office workers (63.5%). TSP findings were the most common (48.1%), followed by PPT's (31.7%) and CPM (20.2%). Based on the QST findings, office workers were divided based on the number of individual QST findings, and higher pain intensity and pain catastrophizing scores were found in office workers with one (N = 38, P < 0.05) or two (N = 28, P < 0.05) compared with office workers with no QST findings (N = 38).

CONCLUSION:

This study demonstrated that most office workers with chronic neck pain exhibit either widespread pressure hyperalgesia, facilitated TSP or impaired CPM, indicating pain sensitization within the central nervous system. This was associated with increased clinical pain and pain catastrophizing rumination scores.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cervicalgia / Dor Crônica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Somatosens Mot Res Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cervicalgia / Dor Crônica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Somatosens Mot Res Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article