Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Emergency Physician Performed Biparietal Diameter Estimate for Gestational Age.
Salerno, Alexis; Flanagan, Kevin; Ghaffarian, Kenn; Al Hazmi, Ahmed; Witting, Michael D; Euerle, Brian D.
Afiliação
  • Salerno A; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: alexis.salerno@som.umaryland.edu.
  • Flanagan K; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Ghaffarian K; Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
  • Al Hazmi A; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Witting MD; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Euerle BD; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
J Emerg Med ; 62(3): 342-347, 2022 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34654585
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

An accurate estimation of fetal gestational age is essential for the management of pregnant patients who present to the emergency department (ED). Point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) is an integral part of emergency medicine training and includes measurement of fetal gestational age by the biparietal diameter (BPD) method.

OBJECTIVES:

In this study we performed a quantitative assessment of emergency physician (EP)-performed BPD estimate of gestational age to identify the percentage of studies performed in our department that had an estimated gestational age within 14 days of an adjusted radiological or obstetrical estimation.

METHODS:

We performed a chart review of our ED ultrasound database and electronic medical records for cases where a BPD measurement was performed by an EP. We recorded the ED gestational age estimate in days and the radiological or obstetrical estimate of gestational age in days. We then calculated the difference in days between the two examinations. We used a normal binomial approximation to calculate 95% confidence intervals. A secondary analysis looked at the quality of the images based on measurement placement and the view obtained.

RESULTS:

Seventy-four cases met eligibility criteria; of those, 67 (91%) had a gestational age estimation within 14 days of the adjusted radiological or obstetrical estimate (95% confidence interval 81-96%).

CONCLUSION:

This study shows that EP-performed BPD measurements for gestational age are quantitatively accurate, with 91% of estimates within 14 days of a standard radiological or obstetrical estimation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Emerg Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Emerg Med Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article