Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How to measure premature mortality? A proposal combining "relative" and "absolute" approaches.
Mazzuco, Stefano; Suhrcke, Marc; Zanotto, Lucia.
Afiliação
  • Mazzuco S; Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Via Cesare Battisti 241, 35121, Padua, Italy. stefano.mazzuco@unipd.it.
  • Suhrcke M; Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research, Maison des Sciences Humaines 11, 4366, Esch-sur-Alzette, Belval, Luxembourg.
  • Zanotto L; Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Popul Health Metr ; 19(1): 41, 2021 10 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34702295
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The concept of "premature mortality" is at the heart of many national and global health measurement and benchmarking efforts. However, despite the intuitive appeal of its underlying concept, it is far from obvious how to best operationalise it. The previous work offers at least two basic approaches an absolute and a relative one. The former-and far more widely used- approach sets a unique age threshold (e.g. 65 years), below which deaths are defined as premature. The relative approach derives the share of premature deaths from the country-specific age distribution of deaths in the country of interest. The biggest disadvantage of the absolute approach is that of using a unique, arbitrary threshold for different mortality patterns, while the main disadvantage of the relative approach is that its estimate of premature mortality strongly depends on how the senescent deaths distribution is defined in each country.

METHOD:

We propose to overcome some of the downsides of the existing approaches, by combining features of both, using a hierarchical model, in which senescent deaths distribution is held constant for each country as a pivotal quantity and the premature mortality distribution is allowed to vary across countries. In this way, premature mortality estimates become more comparable across countries with similar characteristics.

RESULTS:

The proposed hierarchical models provide results, which appear to align with related evidence from  specific countries. In particular, we find a relatively high premature mortality for the United States and Denmark.

CONCLUSIONS:

While our hybrid approach overcomes some of the problems of previous measures, some issues require further research, in particular the choice of the group of countries that a given country is assigned to and the choice of the benchmarks within the groups. Hence, our proposed method, combined with further study addressing these issues, could provide a valid alternative way to measure and compare premature mortality across countries.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Global / Mortalidade Prematura Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Popul Health Metr Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Global / Mortalidade Prematura Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Popul Health Metr Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article