Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Provision of care for pregnant women with IBD in the UK: the current landscape.
Wolloff, Sarah; Moore, Emma; Glanville, Tracey; Limdi, Jimmy; Kok, Klaartje B; Fraser, Aileen; Kent, Alexandra; Mulgabal, Khasia; Nelson-Piercy, Catherine; Selinger, Christian.
Afiliação
  • Wolloff S; Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
  • Moore E; Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
  • Glanville T; Department of Obstetrics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Limdi J; Section of IBD-Division of Gastroenterology, The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Kok KB; Gastroenteterology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
  • Fraser A; Department of Gastroenterology, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Kent A; Department of Gastroenterology, United Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Mulgabal K; Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Nelson-Piercy C; Department of Obstetrics, Royal Bolton Foundation NHS Trust, Bolton, UK.
  • Selinger C; Department of Obstetric Medicine, Guy's and Saint Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Frontline Gastroenterol ; 12(6): 487-492, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34712466
INTRODUCTION: Suboptimal control of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can result in increased rates of adverse pregnancy-related outcomes. We aimed to describe the current landscape of provision of antenatal care for women with IBD in the UK. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey collected data on service setup; principles of care pre-conception, during pregnancy and post partum; and on perceived roles and responsibilities of relevant clinicians. RESULTS: Data were provided for 97 IBD units. Prepregnancy counselling was offered mostly on request only (54%) and in an ad hoc manner. In 86% of units, IBD antenatal care was provided by the patient's usual gastroenterologist, rather than a gastroenterologist with expertise in pregnancy (14%). Combined clinics with obstetricians and gastroenterologists were offered in 14% of units (24% academic vs 7% district hospitals; p=0.043). Communication with obstetrics was 'as and when required' in 51% and 30% of IBD units reviewed pregnant women with IBD 'only when required'. The majority of respondents thought gastroenterologists should be involved in decisions regarding routine vaccinations (70%), breast feeding (80%), folic acid dosage (61%) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis (53%). Sixty-five per cent of respondents thought that gastroenterologists should be involved in decisions around mode of delivery and 30% recommended caesarean sections for previous but healed perianal disease. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide survey found considerable variation in IBD antenatal services. We identified deficiencies in service setup, care provided by IBD units and clinician knowledge. A basic framework to inform service setup, and better education on the available clinical guidance, is required to ensure consistent high-quality multidisciplinary care.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Frontline Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Frontline Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article