Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reduced Hospitalizations and Amputations in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers Treated with Cyclical Pressurized Topical Wound Oxygen Therapy: Real-World Outcomes.
Yellin, Jessica Izhakoff; Gaebler, Julia A; Zhou, Frank F; Niecko, Timothy; Novins, Olivia; Ockert, Amelia; Krzynowek, Darcy; Garoufalis, Matthew G; Lee, Aliza M; Frykberg, Robert G.
Afiliação
  • Yellin JI; Health Advances LLC, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Gaebler JA; Health Advances LLC, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Zhou FF; Health Advances LLC, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Niecko T; Niecko Health Economics LLC, Tierra Verde, Florida, USA.
  • Novins O; Health Advances LLC, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Ockert A; Health Advances LLC, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Krzynowek D; Health Advances LLC, Newton, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Garoufalis MG; Department of Podiatry, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Lee AM; Department of Podiatry, Salem Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salem, Virginia, USA.
  • Frykberg RG; Department of Podiatry, Diabetic Foot Consultants, Midwestern University, Glendale, Arizona, USA.
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) ; 11(12): 657-665, 2022 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34714167
Background: This study sought to examine the real-world impact of multimodality cyclical-pressure topical wound oxygen therapy (TWO2) on hospitalizations and amputations in patients with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) compared with patients without TWO2. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of deidentified patient medical records at 2 U.S. Veterans Affairs hospitals between January 2012 and January 2020. DFU patients were assigned to TWO2 or NO TWO2 cohorts based on their treatment records. Patients received appropriate standard of care and may have received other advanced wound treatments, including skin substitutes, negative pressure wound therapy, and growth factors. Primary study outcomes were patients requiring hospitalization and/or amputation within 360 days of initial wound documentation. Findings: Among unmatched cohorts of 202 patients with DFU (91 TWO2, 111 NO TWO2), 6.6% and 12.1% of TWO2 patients had hospitalizations and amputations, respectively, compared with 54.1% and 41.4% of NO TWO2 patients within 360 days (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001), representing 88% and 71% reductions. Among propensity score-matched cohorts of 140 DFU patients (70 TWO2, 70 NO TWO2), compared with NO TWO2, 82% fewer TWO2 patients were hospitalized (7.1% vs. 40.0%, p < 0.0001) and 73% fewer TWO2 patients had amputations (8.6% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.0007). Logistic regression among matched cohorts demonstrated nearly ninefold and fivefold higher risk of hospitalization and amputation, respectively, for NO TWO2 versus TWO2. Interpretation: This retrospective cohort study demonstrates that treating patients with DFU with TWO2 is associated with significant reductions in hospitalizations and amputations in the real-world setting.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pé Diabético / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pé Diabético / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article