Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identification of Appendicitis Using Ultrasound with the Aid of Machine Learning.
Hayashi, Kentaro; Ishimaru, Tetsuya; Lee, Jaesung; Hirai, Shun; Ooke, Tomoaki; Hosokawa, Takahiro; Omata, Kanako; Sanmoto, Youhei; Kakihara, Tomo; Kawashima, Hiroshi.
Afiliação
  • Hayashi K; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
  • Ishimaru T; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Lee J; Presentation: A summary of this study was presented at the IPEG conference 2021.
  • Hirai S; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
  • Ooke T; Presentation: A summary of this study was presented at the IPEG conference 2021.
  • Hosokawa T; Morpho, Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
  • Omata K; Presentation: A summary of this study was presented at the IPEG conference 2021.
  • Sanmoto Y; Morpho, Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kakihara T; Presentation: A summary of this study was presented at the IPEG conference 2021.
  • Kawashima H; Morpho, Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 31(12): 1412-1419, 2021 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34748429
ABSTRACT

Background:

Diagnosing pediatric appendicitis by ultrasonography (US) is difficult because US requires significant training and skill. We evaluated whether artificial intelligence (AI) can augment US. Materials and

Methods:

Among 70 abdominal ultrasound videos containing 85-347 images each, 50 were used to train the AI neural network. Each video was categorized based on the detection percentage and percent accuracy most (>50%), partial (10-50%), and none (<10%). Test 1 involved verification of appendix detection by AI using the remaining 20 videos. Test 2 involved the evaluation of the effect of AI utilization on pediatricians.

Results:

From 50 videos, 6914 images were used to train the AI network. In test 1, 3 pediatric surgeons judged 10 (50.0%), 4 (20.0%), and 6 (30.0%) videos as "most," "partial," and "none," respectively, regarding the detection percentage; 7 (35.0%), 7 (35.0%), and 6 (30.0%) videos were judged, respectively, concerning the percent accuracy. Five (83.3%) of six test videos with a scan area depth of 8 cm were judged as "none" for both detection and accuracy. In test 2, six videos were also judged as "none" for both categories, showing a negative effect on the participants (5 pediatric residents and 5 pediatric intensive-emergency fellows), but the other categories showed little negative effect.

Conclusions:

Appendicitis in a shallow US scan area can be easily identified with AI support. Even with the detection of a partial appendicitis shadow, AI is still helpful. However, if AI does not detect appendicitis at all, examiners may be negatively affected.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apendicite / Apêndice Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apendicite / Apêndice Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article