Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
'Role of the modulating factors on the self-perceived OHRQoL of fully dentate subjects and wearers of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported FPDs: A cross-sectional study'.
Castillo-Oyagüe, Raquel; Río-Highsmith, Jaime Del; Preciado-Uribe, Arelis; Lynch, Christopher D; García-Minguillán, Gonzalo.
Afiliação
  • Castillo-Oyagüe R; Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid (U.C.M.), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: raquel.castillo@ucm.es.
  • Río-Highsmith JD; Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid (U.C.M.), Madrid, Spain.
  • Preciado-Uribe A; Faculty of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid (U.C.M.), Madrid, Spain.
  • Lynch CD; University Dental School & Hospital/ University College Cork, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.
  • García-Minguillán G; Europa Sur Higher Training Centre (Dentistry, Cesur), Madrid, Spain.
J Dent ; 117: 103887, 2022 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34762987
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This research aimed to compare the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) between fully dentate subjects and edentulous patients wearing implant-supported fixed partial dentures (i-FPDs). The clinical conditions of both types of restorations were evaluated.

METHODS:

Participants were assigned to Group-1 (SR, n = 50) screw-retained i-FPD wearers; Group-2 (CR, n = 50) cement-retained i-FPD wearers; and Group-3 (ND, n = 50) dentate subjects with a healthy natural dentition (controls). Patients answered the OHIP-14sp and QoLIP-10 questionnaires. Data related to sociodemographics, prosthesis features, peri­implant status, complications, and subjective evaluations, were compiled. Potential modulators of the OHRQoL and the i-FPDs' clinical conditions were assessed using non-parametric tests (α= 0.05).

RESULTS:

ND individuals were the least satisfied (OHIP-14sp; p< 0.001). Both prosthodontic groups reported similar levels of wellbeing, excluding the speaking difficulties, which were lower for SR wearers as shown by both scales (p = 0.001). The most discontented patients (OHIP-14sp) were women (p = 0.022), under 65 years (p = 0.03), without partner (p< 0.001) and having a crown (p = 0.033). The level of education/schooling also affected the OHIP-14sp scores (p< 0.001). Implant mobility and peri­implantitis were more frequent among CR wearers (p-values= 0.008 and 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

The OHRQoL of both prosthodontic groups was comparably higher than that of the dentate subjects, who were the most nonconformist. The self-perceived satisfaction was mainly modulated by sociodemographic factors. CLINICAL

SIGNIFICANCE:

Overall, the retention system did not impact the OHRQoL, prosthetic problems, and subjective evaluations of i-FPD wearers. However, the cementation may increase the risk of peri­implant diseases.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Revestimento de Dentadura Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Dent Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Revestimento de Dentadura Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Dent Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article