Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic accuracy of dried blood spots for serology of vaccine-preventable diseases: a systematic review.
Holroyd, Taylor A; Schiaffino, Francesca; Chang, Rachel H; Wanyiri, Jane W; Saldanha, Ian J; Gross, Margaret; Moss, William J; Hayford, Kyla.
Afiliação
  • Holroyd TA; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Schiaffino F; International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Chang RH; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Wanyiri JW; International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Saldanha IJ; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Gross M; International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Moss WJ; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Hayford K; International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 21(2): 185-200, 2022 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34852211
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Venous serum and plasma are optimal specimens for serological testing but may be logistically infeasible. Dried blood spots (DBS) are a feasible alternative, provided results are adequately sensitive and specific. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of DBS to measure IgG and IgM antibodies for vaccine-preventable diseases and compare test validity of DBS with venous blood. AREAS COVERED In October 2020, we searched seven databases for peer-reviewed studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of DBS specimens compared with serum in detecting antibodies to VPDs in humans. We extracted data and assessed risk of bias in all included studies. We calculated sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals for each index-reference test comparison. We narratively synthesized the identified evidence on diagnostic accuracy and blood collection and processing methods for DBS. Studies on measles and rubella IgG and IgM were the most frequently identified and reported generally high sensitivity and specificity. EXPERT OPINION Lack of standardization in collection, storage, and testing methods limited systematic comparison across studies. Our findings indicate a need for additional validation studies on the diagnostic accuracy of DBS to expand their use in serological surveillance. We recommend practical considerations to improve standardized reporting for DBS validation studies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) / Doenças Preveníveis por Vacina / Sarampo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Expert Rev Vaccines Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) / Doenças Preveníveis por Vacina / Sarampo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Expert Rev Vaccines Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article