Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A prehabilitation programme implemented before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy improves peri-operative outcomes and continence recovery.
Rahota, Razvan-George; Salin, Ambroise; Gautier, Jean-Romain; Almeras, Christophe; Garnault, Valérie; Tollon, Christophe; Loison, Guillaume; Beauval, Jean-Baptiste; Ploussard, Guillaume.
Afiliação
  • Rahota RG; Urology Department, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
  • Salin A; Urology Department, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
  • Gautier JR; Urology Department, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
  • Almeras C; Urology Department, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
  • Garnault V; Public Health Department, PMSI, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
  • Tollon C; Urology Department, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
  • Loison G; Urology Department, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
  • Beauval JB; Urology Department, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
  • Ploussard G; Urology Department, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
BJU Int ; 130(3): 357-363, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34854212
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the impact of a routine, on-site, 1-day prehabilitation (PreHab) programme on peri-operative and continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

All 303 consecutive RARPs performed between March 2018 and February 2020 since the routine implementation of PreHab were included in our study. PreHab was carried out according to the availability of the 1-day programme before the planned date of surgery (two sessions per month including four patients per session). The PreHab programme was implemented in 165 patients (54.5%). The primary endpoint was continence recovery, strictly defined as no safety pad use at 1 and 6 months. Secondary endpoints were peri-operative variables (blood loss, operating time, length of stay, transfusion, complications, and readmission rates). Comparisons were made according to whether the PreHab pathway was applied or not (PreHab+ vs PreHab-) in univariable and multivariable models.

RESULTS:

The PreHab pathway was implemented for a stable proportion of patients over time (54.5%). The two cohorts were comparable in terms of preoperative and pathological features (P > 0.05). Length of stay was significantly shorter in the PreHab+ group (1.3 vs 1.9 days; P = 0.001). There was a trend towards fewer complications in the PreHab+ group (P = 0.061). Use of the PreHab pathway was independently correlated with higher continence rates at 1 month (37% vs 60%; P < 0.001) and 6 months (67.4% vs 87.3%; P < 0.001), even after controlling for age, body mass index, prostate volume, type of apical reconstruction, nerve-sparing surgery and lymph node dissection. The main limitation of the study was the absence of randomization.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our experience demonstrates that the PreHab programme is the major predictor of improved peri-operative outcomes and continence recovery after RARP, with sustainable benefits 6 months after surgery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Incontinência Urinária / Robótica / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Incontinência Urinária / Robótica / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article