Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiotherapy Quality Assurance in the PORTEC-3 (TROG 08.04) Trial.
Khaw, P; Do, V; Lim, K; Cunninghame, J; Dixon, J; Vassie, J; Bailey, M; Johnson, C; Kahl, K; Gordon, C; Cook, O; Foo, K; Fyles, A; Powell, M; Haie-Meder, C; D'Amico, R; Bessette, P; Mileshkin, L; Creutzberg, C L; Moore, A.
Afiliação
  • Khaw P; Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: pearly.khaw@petermac.org.
  • Do V; Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Lim K; Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Cunninghame J; Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Dixon J; Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Vassie J; Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Bailey M; Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Johnson C; Blood & Cancer Centre, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Kahl K; Shoalhaven Cancer Care Centre, Nowra, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Gordon C; Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Cook O; Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG), Waratah, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Foo K; Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Fyles A; Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Powell M; Department of Clinical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Haie-Meder C; Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • D'Amico R; Division of Radiation Oncology, ASST-Lecco, Ospedale A. Manzoni, Lecco, Italy.
  • Bessette P; Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
  • Mileshkin L; Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Creutzberg CL; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Moore A; Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG), Waratah, New South Wales, Australia.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 34(3): 198-204, 2022 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34903431
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Quality assurance in radiotherapy (QART) is essential to ensure the scientific integrity of a clinical trial. This paper reports the findings of the retrospective QART assessment for all centres that participated in PORTEC-3; a randomised controlled trial that compared pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy to the pelvis followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The trial showed an overall survival benefit for the addition of the chemotherapy in the management of women with high-risk endometrial cancer. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Clinicians were invited to upload a randomly selected case/s treated at each of the participating sites. Panel reviewers analysed the contours to certify that the target volumes and organ at risk structures were contoured according to guidelines. The results were categorised into acceptable, minor variation, major variation or unevaluable. The radiotherapy plans were dosimetrically evaluated using the well-established Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) protocol.

RESULTS:

Between August 2010 and January 2018, data from 146 patients of 686 consecutively treated patients were retrospectively reviewed. All 16 Australia and New Zealand and 71 of 77 international centres uploaded data for evaluation. In total, 3514 dosimetric and contour variables were reviewed. Of these, 3136 variables were deemed acceptable (89.2%), with 335 minor (9.6%) and 43 major variations (1.2%). Major contour variations included the clinical target volume vaginal vault, clinical target volume parametria and differential planning target volume vault expansion.

CONCLUSION:

The results of the QART assessment confirmed high uniformity and low rates of both minor and major deviations in contouring and dosimetry in all sites. This supports the safe introduction of the PORTEC-3 treatment protocol into routine clinical practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia (Especialidade) Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia (Especialidade) Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article