Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
TERT promoter mutations are associated with longer progression-free and overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma receiving BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy.
Thielmann, Carl M; Matull, Johanna; Zaremba, Anne; Murali, Rajmohan; Chorti, Eleftheria; Lodde, Georg; Jansen, Philipp; Herbst, Rudolf; Terheyden, Patrick; Utikal, Jochen; Pföhler, Claudia; Ulrich, Jens; Kreuter, Alexander; Mohr, Peter; Gutzmer, Ralf; Meier, Friedegund; Dippel, Edgar; Weichenthal, Michael; Kretz, Julia; Möller, Inga; Sucker, Antje; Paschen, Annette; Livingstone, Elisabeth; Zimmer, Lisa; Hadaschik, Eva; Ugurel, Selma; Schadendorf, Dirk; Griewank, Klaus G.
Afiliação
  • Thielmann CM; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany. Electronic address: carlmaximilian.thielmann@uk-essen.de.
  • Matull J; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany.
  • Zaremba A; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany.
  • Murali R; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
  • Chorti E; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany.
  • Lodde G; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany.
  • Jansen P; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany.
  • Herbst R; Skin Cancer Unit, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
  • Terheyden P; Department of Dermatology, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Utikal J; Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Pföhler C; Department of Dermatology, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
  • Ulrich J; Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Harzklinikum Dorothea Christiane Erxleben, Quedlinburg, Germany.
  • Kreuter A; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, HELIOS St. Elisabeth Klinik Oberhausen, University Witten/Herdecke, Oberhausen, Germany.
  • Mohr P; Dermatological Center Buxtehude, Elbe Kliniken Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany.
  • Gutzmer R; Skin Cancer Center, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Mühlenkreiskliniken Minden, Minden, Germany.
  • Meier F; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Dippel E; Department of Dermatology Ludwigshafen, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen Am Rhein GGmbH, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
  • Weichenthal M; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
  • Kretz J; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany.
  • Möller I; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany.
  • Sucker A; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany.
  • Paschen A; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany.
  • Livingstone E; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany.
  • Zimmer L; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany.
  • Hadaschik E; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany.
  • Ugurel S; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany.
  • Schadendorf D; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany.
  • Griewank KG; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Essen, Germany. Electronic address: klaus.griewank@uk-essen.de.
Eur J Cancer ; 161: 99-107, 2022 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34936949
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Around 50% of cutaneous melanomas harbour therapeutically targetable BRAF V600 mutations. Reliable clinical biomarkers predicting duration of response to BRAF-targeted therapies are still lacking. Recent in vitro studies demonstrated that BRAF-MEK inhibitor therapy response is associated with tumour TERT promoter mutation status. We assessed this potential association in a clinical setting.

METHODS:

The study cohort comprised 232 patients with metastatic or unresectable BRAF V600-mutated melanoma receiving combined BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment, including a single-centre retrospective discovery cohort (N = 120) and a prospectively collected multicenter validation cohort (N = 112). Patients were excluded if they received BRAF or MEK inhibitors in an adjuvant setting, as monotherapy, or in combination with immunotherapy. Kaplan-Meier and univariate/multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed as appropriate.

RESULTS:

median age at first diagnosis was 54 years (range 16-84 years). The majority of patients were men 147/232 (63.4%). Most tumours harboured TERT promoter mutations (72%, N = 167). A survival advantage was observed in both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with TERT promoter-mutant versus wild-type tumours in both the discovery cohort (mPFS of 9.6 months [N = 87] vs 5.0 months [N = 33]; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.33-0.96] and mOS of 33.6 months vs 15.0 months; HR = 0.47 [95%CI 0.32-0.70]) as well as the validation cohort (mPFS of 7.3 months [N = 80] vs 5.8 months [N = 32]; HR = 0.67 [95%CI 0.41-1.10] and mOS of 51.1 months vs 15.0 months; HR = 0.33 [95%CI 0.18-0.63]). In the pooled cohort of TERT promoter-mutant (N = 167) versus wild-type (N = 65) tumours, respectively, PFS was 8.9 versus 5.5 months, (HR = 0.62; 95%CI 0.45-0.87; P = 0.004), and OS was 33.6 versus 17.0 months, (HR = 0.51; 95%CI 0.35-0.75, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with melanoma receiving BRAF/MEK-targeted therapies, TERT promoter mutations are associated with longer survival. If validated in larger studies, TERT promoter mutation status should be included as a predictive biomarker in treatment algorithms for advanced melanoma.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Regiões Promotoras Genéticas / Telomerase / Quinases de Proteína Quinase Ativadas por Mitógeno / Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf / Melanoma / Mutação Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Regiões Promotoras Genéticas / Telomerase / Quinases de Proteína Quinase Ativadas por Mitógeno / Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf / Melanoma / Mutação Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Cancer Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article