Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Learner Preferences and Perceptions of Virtual Hand Surgery Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Bartoletta, John J; Hinchcliff, Katherine; Rhee, Peter.
Afiliação
  • Bartoletta JJ; Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Hinchcliff K; Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Rhee P; Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Clinical Investigation Facility, Travis Air Force Base, CA. Electronic address: rhee.peter@mayo.edu.
J Hand Surg Am ; 48(4): 405.e1-405.e8, 2023 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35033403
PURPOSE: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many postgraduate medical education lectures and conferences have been moved to a virtual platform. Questions remain regarding the effectiveness of virtual education, what types of educational offerings can be transitioned to a virtual format, and what types of curricula should still take place in person. METHODS: This study surveyed trainees from the United States who participated in a single institution's hand surgery virtual flipped classroom curriculum of 6 week-long modules. Demographics, premodule and postmodule achieved levels of learning based on Bloom's taxonomy, technology usage, and preferences were surveyed. RESULTS: Of the 65 participants, 41 (63.1%) responded to the survey. Trainees included hand surgery fellows (27/41 [65.9%]), orthopedic surgery residents (11/41[26.8%]), and plastic surgery residents (3/41 [7.3%]). On average, most trainees read, viewed, and participated in more than half of the articles (28/41 [68.3%]), electronic videos (31/41 [75.6%]), and conferences (35/41 [85.4%]) per week. The median level of achieved learning increased from "I can apply" to "I can analyze" for all modules. Self-directed learning was preferred for basic facts and knowledge (26/41 [63.4%]) and faculty-directed learning was preferred to review and practice advanced concepts (34/41 [82.9%]). The participants perceived benefits of the virtual curriculum to include increased scheduling flexibility (8/41[19.5%]), expert opinions (7/41 [17.1%]), and diversity of educational formats (3/41 [7.3%]). The perceived drawbacks included decreased interaction (8/41 [19.5%]), technical difficulties (6/41 [14.6%]), excessive detail (3/41 [7.3%]), and single-institution bias (2/41 [4.9%]). CONCLUSIONS: The flipped virtual classroom model is an effective and preferred method of instruction for trainees. Trainees achieved a higher level of learning following the completion of each week-long module. Considerations for the implementation of a virtual curriculum include content quality, quantity, and reducing single-institution bias. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The implementation of virtual learning can enhance hand surgery education for the modern learner.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 4_TD Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Especialidades Cirúrgicas / COVID-19 Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Hand Surg Am Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 4_TD Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Especialidades Cirúrgicas / COVID-19 Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Hand Surg Am Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article