Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella is detected more frequently in feed milling equipment than in raw feed components or processed animal feed.
Parker, E M; Valcanis, M; Edwards, L J; Andersson, P; Mollenkopf, D F; Wittum, T E.
Afiliação
  • Parker EM; The Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, 1920, Coffey Road, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA.
  • Valcanis M; Microbiological Diagnostic Unit-Public Health Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Edwards LJ; Ridley AgriProducts Pty Ltd, 70-80, Bald Hill Road, Pakenham, Victoria, 3810, Australia.
  • Andersson P; Microbiological Diagnostic Unit-Public Health Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Mollenkopf DF; The Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, 1920, Coffey Road, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA.
  • Wittum TE; The Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, 1920, Coffey Road, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA.
Aust Vet J ; 100(5): 213-219, 2022 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35040117
ABSTRACT
Food for human and animal consumption can provide a vehicle for the transfer of pathogenic and antimicrobial-resistant bacteria into the food chain. We investigated the antimicrobial susceptibility of 453 Salmonella isolates collected from raw feed components, equipment and finished feed from 17 commercial feed mills in Australia between 2012 and 2021. Previous studies have found Salmonella prevalence and the diversity of Salmonella serotypes are greatest in the raw feed components. We, therefore, hypothesised that we would find a greater proportion of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella isolates in the raw feed components compared to other sample types. We found that of 453 isolates tested, 356 (0.80) were susceptible to all antimicrobials tested, 49 (0.11) were nonsusceptible to streptomycin only and 48 (0.11) were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. Of the 48 antimicrobial-resistant isolates, 44 were found in feed milling equipment, two in raw feed components and two in finished feed. Statistical analysis, using a logistic regression with random effects model, found that the population-adjusted mean probability of detecting antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella isolates from feed milling equipment of 0.39, was larger than the probability of detecting resistant isolates in raw feed components 0.01, (P < 0.001) and in finished feed, 0.11, (P = 0.006). This propensity for antimicrobial-resistant bacteria to colonise feed milling equipment has not been previously reported. Further studies are required to understand the ecology of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella in the feed milling environment.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 3_ND Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Salmonelose Animal / Anti-Infecciosos Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Aust Vet J Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 3_ND Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Salmonelose Animal / Anti-Infecciosos Tipo de estudo: Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Aust Vet J Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article