Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis Comparison for Rapid Identification of Pathogenic Virus from Infected Tissue Samples.
Hosokawa-Muto, Junji; Sassa-O'Brien, Yukiko; Fujinami, Yoshihito; Nakahara, Hiroaki.
Afiliação
  • Hosokawa-Muto J; Fifth Biology Section, First Department of Forensic Science, National Research Institute of Police Science, Kashiwa 277-0882, Chiba, Japan.
  • Sassa-O'Brien Y; Laboratory of Veterinary Infectious Disease, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu 183-8509, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Fujinami Y; Fifth Biology Section, First Department of Forensic Science, National Research Institute of Police Science, Kashiwa 277-0882, Chiba, Japan.
  • Nakahara H; Fifth Biology Section, First Department of Forensic Science, National Research Institute of Police Science, Kashiwa 277-0882, Chiba, Japan.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 12(1)2022 Jan 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35054363
ABSTRACT
When examining infectious samples, rapid identification of the pathogenic agent is required for diagnosis and treatment or for investigating the cause of death. In our previous study, we applied exhaustive amplification using non-specific primers (the rapid determination system of viral genome sequences, the RDV method) to identify the causative virus via swab samples from a cat with a suspected viral infection. The purpose of the current study is to investigate suitable methods for the rapid identification of causative pathogens from infected tissue samples. First, the influenza virus was inoculated into mice to prepare infected tissue samples. RNA extracted from the mouse lung homogenates was transcribed into cDNA and then analyzed using the RDV method and next-generation sequencing, using MiSeq and MinION sequencers. The RDV method was unable to detect the influenza virus in the infected tissue samples. However, influenza virus reads were detected using next-generation sequencing. Comparing MiSeq and MinION, the time required for library and sequence preparation was shorter for MinION sequencing than for MiSeq sequencing. We conclude that when a causative virus needs to be rapidly identified from an infectious sample, MinION sequencing is currently the method of choice.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article