Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Q-Methodology and Psychological Phenotyping to Design Patient-Centered Diabetes Education for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes on Insulin Therapy.
Cha, EunSeok; Shin, Myoung Hwan; Smart, Michael; Jang, Hyesun; Lee, Jooseon; Joung, Kyong Hye; Kim, Hyun Jin; Faulkner, Melissa Spezia.
Afiliação
  • Cha E; College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.
  • Shin MH; Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Smart M; School of Communication and Media, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Jang H; Byrdine F. Lewis College of Nursing and Health Professions, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Lee J; College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.
  • Joung KH; College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.
  • Kim HJ; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea.
  • Faulkner MS; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea.
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care ; 48(2): 98-110, 2022 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35118919
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to identify the psychological phenotypes of persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on insulin therapy to better inform personalized diabetes education strategies to improve self-management behaviors.

METHODS:

Q-methodology, a research approach combining the quantitative rigor of statistical analysis with qualitative data on perception of diabetes self-management by persons with T2D on insulin therapy, was used. The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activity measure and A1C in the past 6 months were used to further describe self-management behaviors of each P-sample, Q-sorter. Of 160 statements, 33 Q-sample statements were selected as Q-set. Then, 37 P-samples (24 men; 13 women) were recruited from a university-affiliated diabetes clinic in South Korea. Data obtained from each P-sample with a Q-set and a Q-sorting table, a forced-choice normal distribution table, were analyzed using varimax rotation.

RESULTS:

Forty-one percent of the variance was explained with 5 factors represented by 27 Q-sorters, explaining variance ranging from 5% to 17% for each factor Factor A (n = 6) those showing self-management education need but possessing inadequate health literacy; Factor B (n = 4) those valuing lifestyle modification to control diabetes; Factor C (n = 5) those valuing antidiabetic medication to control diabetes; Factor D (n = 6) carpe diem, accepting diabetes as destiny; and Factor E (n = 6) those overestimating their competencies to control diabetes. Ten Q-sorters fell into either confounded or nonsignificant.

CONCLUSIONS:

Tailoring messages and educational approaches based on patients' psychological phenotypes are necessary to promote optimal self-management behaviors.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Autogestão Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Autogestão Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article