Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predicting Solubility of Newly-Approved Drugs (2016-2020) with a Simple ABSOLV and GSE(Flexible-Acceptor) Consensus Model Outperforming Random Forest Regression.
Avdeef, Alex; Kansy, Manfred.
Afiliação
  • Avdeef A; in-ADME Research, 1732 First Avenue #102, New York, NY 10128 USA.
  • Kansy M; Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
J Solution Chem ; 51(9): 1020-1055, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35153342
ABSTRACT
This study applies the 'Flexible-Acceptor' variant of the General Solubility Equation, GSE(Φ,B), to the prediction of the aqueous intrinsic solubility, log10 S 0, of FDA recently-approved (2016-2020) 'small-molecule' new molecular entities (NMEs). The novel equation had been shown to predict the solubility of drugs beyond Lipinski's 'Rule of 5' chemical space (bRo5) to a precision nearly matching that of the Random Forest Regression (RFR) machine learning method. Since then, it was found that the GSE(Φ,B) appears to work well not only for bRo5 NMEs, but also for Ro5 drugs. To put context to GSE(Φ,B), Yalkowsky's GSE(classic), Abraham's ABSOLV, and Breiman's RFR models were also applied to predict log10 S 0 of 72 newly-approve NMEs, for which useable reported solubility values could be accessed (nearly 60% from FDA New Drug Application published reports). Except for GSE (classic), the prediction models were retrained with an enlarged version of the Wiki-pS 0 database (nearly 400 added log10 S 0 entries since our recent previous study). Thus, these four models were further validated by the additional independent solubility measurements which the newly-approved drugs introduced. The prediction methods ranked RFR ~ GSE (Φ,B) > ABSOLV > GSE (classic) in performance. It was further demonstrated that the biases generated in the four separate models could be nearly eliminated in a consensus model based on the average of just two of the

methods:

GSE (Φ,B) and ABSOLV. The resulting consensus prediction equation is simple in form and can be easily incorporated into spreadsheet calculations. Even more significant, it slightly outperformed the RFR method.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Solution Chem Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Solution Chem Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article