Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical evaluation questionnaire in advanced cancer: a psychometric study of a novel measure of healthcare provider interactions.
de Vries, Froukje E; Mah, Kenneth; Malfitano, Carmine; Shapiro, Gilla K; Zimmermann, Camilla; Hales, Sarah; Rodin, Gary.
Afiliação
  • de Vries FE; Department of Psychiatry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Mah K; Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (University Health Network), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Malfitano C; Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (University Health Network), Toronto, Ontario, Canada kenneth.mah@uhnresearch.ca.
  • Shapiro GK; Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (University Health Network), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Zimmermann C; Global Institute of Psychosocial, Palliative and End-of-Life Care (GIPPEC), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (University Health Network) and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Hales S; Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (University Health Network), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Rodin G; Global Institute of Psychosocial, Palliative and End-of-Life Care (GIPPEC), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (University Health Network) and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35172981
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The Clinical Evaluation Questionnaire (CEQ) is a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) that assesses the perceived benefit of therapeutic interactions of patients with advanced cancer with their healthcare providers concerning issues relevant to their illness. It was developed for a randomised controlled trial of Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM), a brief supportive-expressive therapy for patients with advanced cancer. The present study evaluates the preliminary psychometric properties of the CEQ.

METHOD:

Patients in the CALM and usual care groups completed the CEQ 3 (n=195) and 6 (n=186) months after randomisation. The CEQ's internal consistency, factor structure and concurrent validity were evaluated, and CEQ scores in the treatment groups were compared.

RESULTS:

The CEQ demonstrated high internal consistency for both treatment arms (Cronbach's α=0.94 to 0.95), and a single factor was consistently found in exploratory factor analyses. CEQ scores correlated significantly with satisfaction with the relationship with healthcare providers (r=0.23 to 0.61, p≤0.02) and life completion (r=0.24 to 0.37, p≤0.02) in both groups and with spiritual well-being in the CALM group (meaning r=0.23 to 0.24, p=0.01 to 0.02; faith r=0.24 to 0.34, p=0.001 to 0.02). The CALM group showed higher CEQ total scores than usual care at 6 months (CALM 18.19±6.59; usual care 14.36±7.67, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The CEQ is a reliable and valid PREM of the benefit perceived by patients with advanced cancer from their interactions with healthcare providers. Further study is needed to establish its value as a measure of perceived intervention benefit across different clinical and research settings.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Support Palliat Care Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Support Palliat Care Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article