Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of Patient-Centered Outcomes When Treating Maxillary Constriction Using a Slow Removable Versus a Rapid Fixed Expansion Appliance in the Adolescence Period: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Rabah, Nancy; Al-Ibrahim, Heba M; Hajeer, Mohammad Y; Ajaj, Mowaffak A; Mahmoud, Ghiath.
Afiliação
  • Rabah N; Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus, SYR.
  • Al-Ibrahim HM; Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus, SYR.
  • Hajeer MY; Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus, SYR.
  • Ajaj MA; Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus, SYR.
  • Mahmoud G; Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus, SYR.
Cureus ; 14(3): e22793, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35261839
ABSTRACT
Objective This study aimed to evaluate and compare the levels of pain, discomfort, and functional impairments between slow and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in treating skeletal maxillary constriction in the adolescence period (i.e., between 12 and 16 years). Materials and methods The study sample consisted of 52 patients (21 males and 31 females) with maxillary skeletal constriction in the posterior region. The patients were randomly distributed into either RME (26 patients, with a mean age of 13.87 (± 1.31) years) or slow maxillary expansion group (SME, 26 patients, with a mean age of 14.31 (± 1.19) years). The levels of pain, discomfort, and functional difficulties were assessed after 24 hours (T1), 7 days (T2), 15 days (T3), one month (T4), and four months (T5) following the onset of the expansion procedure. Results Patients in the RME group encountered significantly greater levels of pain and discomfort than those in the SME group at T1, T2, and T3 (p>0.001). Chewing and swallowing difficulties were significantly greater in the RME group at T1, T2, T3, and T4 (P≤0.001). The pressure on soft tissue was greater in the RME group at T2 and T3 (p>0.001). After four months (T5), the levels of pain and discomfort decreased to their lowest levels, as well as the difficulties of chewing and swallowing, and the pressure on soft tissue were almost non-existent in both groups. Conclusion Patients treated with the removable slow maxillary expander reported lower levels of pain and discomfort, fewer chewing and swallowing difficulties, and less pressure on soft tissues than those treated with the bonded rapid maxillary expander. These difficulties gradually decreased over time in both groups. The lower levels of pain and discomfort may make the SME an effective and comfortable treatment alternative for adolescents with skeletal maxillary constriction.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article