Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing quality of older persons' emergency transitions between long-term and acute care settings: a proof-of-concept study.
Tate, Kaitlyn; McLane, Patrick; Reid, Colin; Rowe, Brian H; Cummings, Garnet; Estabrooks, Carole A; Cummings, Greta.
Afiliação
  • Tate K; Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • McLane P; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Reid C; Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Rowe BH; School of Health and Exercise Science, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Cummings G; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Estabrooks CA; School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Cummings G; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
BMJ Open Qual ; 11(1)2022 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35264332
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Long-term care (LTC) residents frequently experience transitions in the location of more advanced care delivery, including receiving emergency department (ED) care. In this proof-of-concept study, we aimed to determine if we could identify measures in quality of care across transitions from LTC to the ED, via emergency medical services and back, by applying Institute of Medicine (IOM) Quality of Care Domains to an existing dataset.

METHODS:

In the Older Persons' Transitions in Care (OPTIC) study, we collected information on residents' transitions in two Western Canadian cities. We applied the IOM's Quality of Care Domains to the OPTIC data to create binary measures of transition quality. We report the median (MED) per cent and IQR of measures met within each domain of quality.

RESULTS:

We tracked 637 transitions over a 12-month period, with data collected from each setting. We developed 19 safety measures, 20 measures of resident-centred care, 3 measures of timely care and 5 measures of effective care. We were unable to develop measures for equitable care at an individual transfer level. Domain scores varied across individual transitions, with the highest scores in safety (MED 79%, IQR 63-95), efficiency (66%; IQR 66-99), and resident-centred (45%; IQR 25-65), followed by effectiveness (36%; IQR 16-56), and timeliness (0%; IQR 0-50).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results show variation in scores across the domains of quality suggesting that it is possible to track quality of transitions for individuals across all settings, and not only within settings. We recommend that future work in tracking quality of care be performed at several levels (LTC, region, health authority, province). Such tracking is necessary to evaluate and improve overall quality of care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços Médicos de Emergência / Cuidado Transicional Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Qual Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços Médicos de Emergência / Cuidado Transicional Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Qual Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article