Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the Affect Integration Inventory in a sample of patients with personality disorders: A cross-sectional study.
Frederiksen, Christina; Solbakken, Ole André; Licht, Rasmus W; Christensen, Ann-Eva; Jørgensen, Carsten René; Telléus, Gry Kjaersdam.
Afiliação
  • Frederiksen C; Clinic North, Psychiatric Hospital, Bronderslev, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. Electronic address: ckf@rn.dk.
  • Solbakken OA; Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Licht RW; Psychiatry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Christensen AE; Psychiatry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Jørgensen CR; Department of Psychology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Telléus GK; Psychiatry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Psychology, Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Denmark.
Acta Psychol (Amst) ; 225: 103554, 2022 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35276544
ABSTRACT
Affect integration is defined as the capacity to comprehend emotional experiences as meaningful and to convert this knowledge into well-adjusted motivation, communication and behavior. Thus, affect integration is considered essential for personal adjustment and well-being, and it has been operationalized through the Affect Integration Inventory. However, the validity of this questionnaire has been examined only in non-clinical respondents. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire in a sample of patients with personality disorders (n = 87). The internal structure and consistency were addressed using Cronbach's alpha and confirmatory factor analysis. To determine aspects of convergent and discriminant validity, the correlations between the scores on the questionnaire and the scores on content-related questionnaires and scales were examined. Finally, scores from the clinical respondents and existing data from a previously collected non-clinical sample (n = 157) were compared to evaluate the external validity. The overall results demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, a consistent factor structure, and systematic patterns of convergent and discriminant validity. Additionally, the findings indicated that the instrument clearly differentiated the clinical sample from the non-clinical sample.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos da Personalidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Psychol (Amst) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transtornos da Personalidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Psychol (Amst) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article