Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Glucose meter standardization across a large academic hospital system.
Tolan, Nicole V; Melanson, Stacy E F; Kane, Gregory; Avery, Kathleen Ryan; Fitzsimons, Deirdre; Gregory, Kim; Goonan, Ellen M; Lewandrowski, Kent B; Tanasijevic, Milenko J.
Afiliação
  • Tolan NV; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: mtanasijevic@bwh.harvard.edu.
  • Melanson SEF; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Kane G; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Avery KR; Department of Nursing, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Fitzsimons D; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Gregory K; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Goonan EM; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Lewandrowski KB; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Tanasijevic MJ; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Clin Chim Acta ; 531: 204-211, 2022 Jun 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35341764
BACKGROUND: To select and standardize point-of-care (POC) glucose meters across a multi-hospital system. METHODS: We formed a multidisciplinary POC glucose standardization working group including key stakeholders from each site. A set of selection criteria: usability, clinical and laboratory performance, indications for use, interface connectivity, ease of implementation and ongoing operational costs were used to develop a scoring schemato facilitate a consensus-driven selection process. RESULTS: Method comparison and consensus error grid evaluation against the clinically validated reference methods demonstrated that the analytical performance for all candidate meters was comparable for both the laboratory and clinical evaluation. However, Meter 1 ranked highest in usability evaluations, implementation and streamlined interface connectivity. The meter selection process and implementation were staggered across sites due to complexity of transitioning to a new manufacturer's meter and limitations in vendor support for training and ongoing troubleshooting of interface connectivity. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of POC glucose meters in a large multi-hospital system is a complex undertaking requiring robust, multidisciplinary organizational structure both system-wide and locally, development of consensus-driven selection tools, usability evaluation by end-users, laboratory and clinical evaluation of the analytical performance, and a strong vendor-laboratory partnership during the implementation process.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Glicemia / Glucose Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Chim Acta Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Glicemia / Glucose Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Chim Acta Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article