Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The INVEST trial: a randomised feasibility trial of psychologically informed vestibular rehabilitation versus current gold standard physiotherapy for people with Persistent Postural Perceptual Dizziness.
Herdman, David; Norton, Sam; Murdin, Louisa; Frost, Kate; Pavlou, Marousa; Moss-Morris, Rona.
Afiliação
  • Herdman D; Health Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Guy's Hospital Campus, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
  • Norton S; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Murdin L; Health Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Guy's Hospital Campus, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
  • Frost K; Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Pavlou M; Guy's and St, Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Moss-Morris R; Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK.
J Neurol ; 269(9): 4753-4763, 2022 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35397754
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Persistent postural perceptual dizziness (PPPD) is a common and disabling functional neuro-vestibular disorder. We aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a randomised controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy informed vestibular rehabilitation (INVEST intervention) designed for persistent dizziness.

METHODS:

A two-armed parallel groups randomised feasibility study of INVEST vs. a time-matched gold standard vestibular rehabilitation (VRT) control. Participants with PPPD were recruited from a specialist vestibular clinic in London, UK. Participants were individually randomised using a minimisation procedure with allocation concealment. Measures of feasibility and clinical outcome were collected and assessed at 4 months.

RESULTS:

Forty adults with PPPD were randomised to six sessions of INVEST (n = 20) or gold standard VRT (n = 20). Overall, 59% of patients screened met the inclusion criteria, of which 80% enrolled. Acceptability of INVEST, as assessed against the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA), was excellent and 80% adhered to all 6 sessions. There were small to moderate treatment effects in favour of INVEST across all measures, including dizziness handicap, negative illness perceptions, symptom focussing, fear avoidance, and distress (standardised mean difference [SMD]g = 0.45; SMDg = 0.77; SMDg = 0.56; SMDg = 0.50, respectively). No intervention-related serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS:

The study results give strong support for the feasibility of a full-scale trial. Both arms had high rates of recruitment, retention, and acceptability. There was promising support of the benefits of integrated cognitive-behavioural therapy-based vestibular rehabilitation compared to gold standard vestibular rehabilitation. The study fulfilled all the a-priori criteria to advance to a full-scale efficacy trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN10420559.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vestíbulo do Labirinto / Tontura Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vestíbulo do Labirinto / Tontura Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article