Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the Call for a Kit intervention to increase bowel cancer screening uptake in Lancashire, England.
Stoffel, Sandro T; McGregor, Lesley; Hirst, Yasemin; Hanif, Sahida; Morris, Lorraine; von Wagner, Christian.
Afiliação
  • Stoffel ST; Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • McGregor L; Institute for Pharmaceutical Medicine, 27209University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Hirst Y; Division of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, 7622University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
  • Hanif S; Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • Morris L; 1756Blackpool Teaching Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK.
  • von Wagner C; 1756Blackpool Teaching Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK.
J Med Screen ; 29(3): 166-171, 2022 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35410541
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the 'Call for a Kit' health promotion intervention that was initiated in Lancashire, England to improve bowel cancer screening uptake.

METHODS:

Within the intervention, screening non-responders are called and invited to attend a consultation with a health promotion team member at their primary care practice. In this audit, we analysed the proportion of those contacted who attended the in-person clinic versus those who received a phone consultation, the number returning a test kit from in-person versus phone consultations, and the extent to which test kit return was moderated by sociodemographic characteristics.

RESULTS:

In 2019, 68 practices participated in the intervention which led to 10,772 individuals being contacted; 2464 accepted the invitation to an in-person consultation, of whom 1943 attended. A further 1065 agreed to and attended a consultation over the phone. The 3008 consultations resulted in 2890 test kits being ordered, of which 1608 (55.6%) were returned. The intervention therefore yielded a 14.9% response rate in the total cohort; 71.5% of test kits came from individuals attending the in-person consultation. Women and those registered with a practice in socioeconomically deprived areas were less likely to return the test kit. Individuals with a black, mixed or a non-Indian/Pakistani Asian ethnic background were significantly more likely to accept the offer of an in-person consultation and return the test kit.

CONCLUSION:

Our analysis demonstrated the strong likelihood of people returning a test kit after an in-person appointment but also the usefulness of using phone consultations as a safety net for people unable or unwilling to attend in-person clinics.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Med Screen Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal / 2_ODS3 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Med Screen Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article