Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure and postoperative pulmonary complications: a patient-level meta-analysis of three randomised clinical trials.
Campos, Niklas S; Bluth, Thomas; Hemmes, Sabrine N T; Librero, Julian; Pozo, Natividad; Ferrando, Carlos; Ball, Lorenzo; Mazzinari, Guido; Pelosi, Paolo; Gama de Abreu, Marcelo; Schultz, Marcus J; Serpa Neto, A.
Afiliação
  • Campos NS; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Cardio-Pulmonary Department, Pulmonary Division, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Bluth T; Pulmonary Engineering Group, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Hemmes SNT; Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Librero J; Navarrabiomed-Fundación Miguel Servet, Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Pamplona, Spain.
  • Pozo N; INCLIVA Clinical Research Institute, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
  • Ferrando C; Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
  • Ball L; Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
  • Mazzinari G; Research Group in Perioperative Medicine, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain; Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain.
  • Pelosi P; Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, San Martino Policlinico Hospital - IRCCS for Oncology, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
  • Gama de Abreu M; Pulmonary Engineering Group, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
  • Schultz MJ; Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (LEICA), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Nuffield Department of Medicine, Uni
  • Serpa Neto A; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Cardio-Pulmonary Department, Pulmonary Division, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Department of Intensive Care, Amster
Br J Anaesth ; 128(6): 1040-1051, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35431038
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

High intraoperative PEEP with recruitment manoeuvres may improve perioperative outcomes. We re-examined this question by conducting a patient-level meta-analysis of three clinical trials in adult patients at increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications who underwent non-cardiothoracic and non-neurological surgery.

METHODS:

The three trials enrolled patients at 128 hospitals in 24 countries from February 2011 to February 2018. All patients received volume-controlled ventilation with low tidal volume. Analyses were performed using one-stage, two-level, mixed modelling (site as a random effect; trial as a fixed effect). The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications within the first week, analysed using mixed-effect logistic regression. Pre-specified subgroup analyses of nine patient characteristics and seven procedure and care-delivery characteristics were also performed.

RESULTS:

Complete datasets were available for 1913 participants ventilated with high PEEP and recruitment manoeuvres, compared with 1924 participants who received low PEEP. The primary outcome occurred in 562/1913 (29.4%) participants randomised to high PEEP, compared with 620/1924 (32.2%) participants randomised to low PEEP (unadjusted odds ratio [OR]=0.87; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.75-1.01; P=0.06). Higher PEEP resulted in 87/1913 (4.5%) participants requiring interventions for desaturation, compared with 216/1924 (11.2%) participants randomised to low PEEP (OR=0.34; 95% CI, 0.26-0.45). Intraoperative hypotension was associated more frequently (784/1913 [41.0%]) with high PEEP, compared with low PEEP (579/1924 [30.1%]; OR=1.87; 95% CI, 1.60-2.17).

CONCLUSIONS:

High PEEP combined with recruitment manoeuvres during low tidal volume ventilation in patients undergoing major surgery did not reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03937375 (Clinicaltrials.gov).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Respiração com Pressão Positiva / Pneumopatias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Respiração com Pressão Positiva / Pneumopatias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article