Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prediction of Visual Acuity after anti-VEGF Therapy in Diabetic Macular Edema by Machine Learning.
Zhang, Ying; Xu, Fabao; Lin, Zhenzhe; Wang, Jiawei; Huang, Chao; Wei, Min; Zhai, Weibin; Li, Jianqiao.
Afiliação
  • Zhang Y; Department of Ophthalmology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  • Xu F; Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  • Lin Z; Shandong Qidu Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Neuroprotective Drugs, Zibo, China.
  • Wang J; Department of Ophthalmology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  • Huang C; State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Wei M; Department of Ophthalmology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  • Zhai W; Department of Ophthalmology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
  • Li J; Department of Ophthalmology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
J Diabetes Res ; 2022: 5779210, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35493607
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To predict visual acuity (VA) 1 month after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) by using machine learning.

Methods:

This retrospective study included 281 eyes with DME receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment from January 1, 2019, to April 1, 2021. Eighteen features from electronic medical records and measurements data from OCT images were extracted. The data obtained from January 1, 2019, to November 1, 2020, were used as the training set; the data obtained from November 1, 2020, to April 1, 2021, were used as the validation set. Six different machine learning algorithms were used to predict VA in patients after anti-VEGF therapy. After the initial detailed investigation, we designed an optimization model for convenient application. The VA predicted by machine learning was compared with the ground truth.

Results:

The ensemble algorithm (linear regression + random forest regressor) performed best in VA and VA variance predictions. In the validation set, the mean absolute errors (MAEs) of VA predictions were 0.137-0.153 logMAR (within 7-8 letters), and the mean square errors (MSEs) were 0.033-0.045 logMAR (within 2-3 letters) for the 1-month VA predictions, respectively. For the prediction of VA variance at 1 month, the MAEs were 0.164-0.169 logMAR (within 9 letters), and the MSEs were 0.056-0.059 logMAR (within 3 letters), respectively.

Conclusions:

Our machine learning models could accurately predict VA and VA variance in DME patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy 1 month after, which would be much valuable to guide precise individualized interventions and manage expectations in clinical practice.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Edema Macular / Diabetes Mellitus / Retinopatia Diabética Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Diabetes Res Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Edema Macular / Diabetes Mellitus / Retinopatia Diabética Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Diabetes Res Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article