Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Orthopedic surgeons and physical therapists differ regarding rehabilitative needs after lower extremity fracture repair.
McLaughlin, Kevin H; Archer, Kristin R; Shafiq, Babar; Wegener, Stephen T; Reider, Lisa.
Afiliação
  • McLaughlin KH; School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Archer KR; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Drive, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Shafiq B; School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Wegener ST; School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Reider L; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Physiother Theory Pract ; 39(11): 2446-2453, 2023 Nov 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35594136
BACKGROUND: Little evidence is available to guide physical therapy (PT) following lower extremity fracture repair distal to the hip. As such, variability has been reported in the way PT is utilized post-operatively. Examination of current practice by orthopedic surgeons (OS) and physical therapists is needed to inform clinical practice guidelines in this area. OBJECTIVE: To describe current PT referral practices among OS, identify patient and clinical factors that affect PT referral, and examine differences between OS and physical therapists with regard to visit frequency, duration, and use of specific PT interventions. METHODS: Provider surveys. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 100 OS and 347 physical therapists. Over half (54%) of OS reported referring "most patients" to PT and identified joint stiffness and strength limitations as top reasons for PT referral. Over 80% of OS and physical therapists indicated that joint stiffness, strength limitations, and patients' functional goals affected their recommendations for PT visit frequency. More physical therapists than OS reported that pain severity (55% vs 25%, p < .001), maladaptive pain behaviors (64% vs. 33%, p < .001), and patient self-efficacy (70% vs. 49%, p = .003) affected their visit frequency recommendations. While OS recommended more frequent PT for patients with peri-articular fractures, fracture type had minimal impact on the visit frequencies recommended by physical therapists. CONCLUSION: OS and physical therapists consider similar physical impairments when determining the need for PT and visit frequencies, however, physical therapists consider pain and psychosocial factors more often, with OS focusing more on injury type.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fisioterapeutas / Cirurgiões Ortopédicos / Artropatias Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Physiother Theory Pract Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fisioterapeutas / Cirurgiões Ortopédicos / Artropatias Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Physiother Theory Pract Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article