Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Factors Associated with the Clinical Outcomes of Iatrogenic Colonic Perforation].
Lee, Hyun Jin; Lee, Han Hee; Cheung, Dae Young; Kim, Jin Il; Park, Soo-Heon.
Afiliação
  • Lee HJ; Department of Internal Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
  • Lee HH; Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Cheung DY; Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim JI; Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park SH; Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Gastroenterol ; 79(5): 210-216, 2022 05 25.
Article em Ko | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35610551
ABSTRACT
Background/

Aims:

This study evaluated the incidence of iatrogenic colonic perforation (ICP) in a high-volume center and analyzed the clinical outcomes and associated factors.

Methods:

As a retrospective study of the electronic medical records, the whole data of patients who underwent colonoscopy from June 2004 to May 2020 were reviewed.

Results:

During 16 years, 69,458 procedures were performed, of which 60,288 were diagnostic and 9,170 were therapeutic. ICP occurred in 0.027% (16/60,288) for diagnostic colonoscopies and in 0.076% (7/9,170) for therapeutic purposes (p=0.015; hazard ratio 2.878; 95% CI, 1.184-6.997). Fifty-two percent (12 cases) were managed with endoscopic clip closure, and 43.5% (10 cases) required surgery. The reasons for the procedure and the procedure timing appeared to affect the treatment decision. Perforations during therapeutic colonoscopy were treated with surgery more often than those for diagnostic purposes (66.7% [4/6] vs. 37.5% [6/16], p=0.221). Regarding the timing of the procedure, ICP that occurred in the afternoon session was more likely treated surgically (56.3% [9/16] vs. 0/5, p=0.027). Mortality occurred in two patients (2/23, 8.7%). Both were aged (mean age 84.0±1.4 vs. 65.7±10.5, p<0.001) and lately recognized (mean elapsed time [hours], 43.8±52.5 vs. 1.5±3.0, p<0.001) than the surviving patients.

Conclusions:

ICP occurs in less than 0.1% of cases. The events that occurred during the morning session were more likely managed endoscopically. Age over 80 years and a longer time before perforation recognition were associated with mortality.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças do Colo / Perfuração Intestinal Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: Ko Revista: Korean J Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças do Colo / Perfuração Intestinal Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: Ko Revista: Korean J Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article