Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of a duplex PCR technique using the gen E and RNase P for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.
Palacio Rua, Katherine; García Correa, Juan Felipe; Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar; Afanador Ayala, Carlos; Rugeles, María Teresa; Zuluaga, Andrés F.
Afiliação
  • Palacio Rua K; Laboratorio Integrado de Medicina Especializada (LIME), Facultad de Medicina, IPS Universitaria, Universidad de Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia.
  • García Correa JF; Laboratorio Integrado de Medicina Especializada (LIME), Facultad de Medicina, IPS Universitaria, Universidad de Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia.
  • Aguilar-Jiménez W; Grupo Inmunovirología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia.
  • Afanador Ayala C; Laboratorio Integrado de Medicina Especializada (LIME), Facultad de Medicina, IPS Universitaria, Universidad de Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia.
  • Rugeles MT; Grupo Inmunovirología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia.
  • Zuluaga AF; Laboratorio Integrado de Medicina Especializada (LIME), Facultad de Medicina, IPS Universitaria, Universidad de Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia. Electronic address: andres.zuluaga@udea.edu.co.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 40(8): 428-435, 2022 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35643923
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the standard technique for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. The World Health Organization recommends the Charité-Berlin protocol for COVID-19 diagnosis, which requires triple PCR, limiting the process capability of laboratories and delaying the results. In order to reduce these limitations, a duplex PCR is validated for the detection of the E and ribonuclease P genes.

METHODS:

We compared the limit of detection, sensitivity and specificity of the duplex PCR technique (E gene and Rnasa P) against the monoplex standard (E gene) in RNA samples from a SARS-CoV-2 isolate and 88 clinical specimens with previously known results. The repeatability and reproducibility of the threshold cycle values ​​(Ct) were determined in two independent laboratories of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad de Antioquia, using different reagents and real time instruments.

RESULTS:

There were no significant differences in the Ct results between both techniques (P = .84). Using the monoplex PCR of E gene as a reference, the interrater reliability analysis showed similarity between the two techniques, with a kappa coefficient of 0.89, the sensitivity and the specificity of duplex PCR were 90% and 87%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Duplex PCR does not affect the sensitivity and specificity reported by the Charité, Berlin protocol, being a useful tool for SARS-CoV-2 screening in clinical samples.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 / 4_TD Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 / 4_TD Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article