Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ischemic time and patient outcomes after the 2018 UNOS donor heart allocation system change.
Siddiqi, Umar; Lirette, Seth; Hoang, Ryan; Cruz, Jennifer; Mohammed, Asim; Copeland, Jack; Baran, David A; Copeland, Hannah.
Afiliação
  • Siddiqi U; Department of Surgery, Section of Cardiac Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Lirette S; Fulcrum, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
  • Hoang R; Department of Surgery, Section of Cardiac Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Cruz J; Department of Surgery, Section of Cardiac Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Mohammed A; Lutheran Hospital Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Transplant, Mechanical Circulatory Support and ECMO - Fort Wayne, Indiana University School of Medicine - Fort Wayne (IUSM-FW), Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA.
  • Copeland J; Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
  • Baran DA; Clevelad Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute Division of Cardiology, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
  • Copeland H; Lutheran Hospital Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Transplant, Mechanical Circulatory Support and ECMO - Fort Wayne, Indiana University School of Medicine - Fort Wayne (IUSM-FW), Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA.
J Card Surg ; 37(9): 2685-2690, 2022 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35678362
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The allocation system for heart donors in the United States changed on October 18, 2018. The typical distance from donor hospitals to recipient hospitals has increased as has the ischemic time. We investigated patient outcomes with the new allocation system and the differential effects of ischemic time under both the old and new allocation schemas.

METHODS:

The United Network for Organ Sharing Registry (UNOS) was queried for data regarding heart transplants occurring from October 1, 1987 to March 1, 2021. In total, 62,301 adult heart transplants were examined. Survival outcomes at 30 days and 1 year and ischemic times were compared via adjusted logistic and Cox models (overall survival and time until post-transplant rejection).

RESULTS:

Mean ischemic time was slightly increased in the new system (3.43 h vs. 3.03 h, p < .001). Survival differences between old versus new systems were not observed in adjusted models (p = .818). However, there was evidence to suggest longer ischemic times are more detrimental to long-term survival under the new system (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.15 per hour increase; p = .001) versus the old system (HR = 1.08 per hour increase; p < .001), although this relationship did not reach statistical significance (p = .150).

CONCLUSIONS:

Although travel distances have significantly increased under the new allocation system, survival outcomes remain largely unchanged. Ischemic time is an influential factor in recipient survival that should be limited during organ transport. Further studies on the impact of travel distances and ischemic time under the new allocation system are needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Coração Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Card Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos / Transplante de Coração Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Card Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article