Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
HIOPP-6 - a pilot study on the evaluation of an electronic tool to assess and reduce the complexity of drug treatment considering patients' views.
Wurmbach, Viktoria S; Schmidt, Steffen J; Lampert, Anette; Bernard, Simone; Meid, Andreas D; Frick, Eduard; Metzner, Michael; Wilm, Stefan; Mortsiefer, Achim; Bücker, Bettina; Altiner, Attila; Sparenberg, Lisa; Szecsenyi, Joachim; Peters-Klimm, Frank; Kaufmann-Kolle, Petra; Thürmann, Petra A; Seidling, Hanna M; Haefeli, Walter E.
Afiliação
  • Wurmbach VS; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Schmidt SJ; Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Lampert A; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58448, Witten, Germany.
  • Bernard S; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Meid AD; Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Frick E; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58448, Witten, Germany.
  • Metzner M; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Wilm S; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Mortsiefer A; Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Bücker B; Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (Chs), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Altiner A; Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (Chs), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Sparenberg L; Present Address: Professorship of Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58448, Witten, Germany.
  • Szecsenyi J; Institute of General Practice (Ifam), Centre for Health and Society (Chs), Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
  • Peters-Klimm F; Institute of General Practice, Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Straße 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
  • Kaufmann-Kolle P; Institute of General Practice, Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Straße 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
  • Thürmann PA; Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Seidling HM; Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Haefeli WE; AQUA-Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, Maschmühlenweg 8-10, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.
BMC Prim Care ; 23(1): 164, 2022 06 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35764923
BACKGROUND: A complex drug treatment might pose a barrier to safe and reliable drug administration for patients. Therefore, a novel tool automatically analyzes structured medication data for factors possibly contributing to complexity and subsequently personalizes the results by evaluating the relevance of each identified factor for the patient by means of key questions. Hence, tailor-made optimization measures can be proposed. METHODS: In this controlled, prospective, exploratory trial the tool was evaluated with nine general practitioners (GP) in three study groups: In the two intervention groups the tool was applied in a version with (GI_with) and a version without (GI_without) integrated key questions for the personalization of the analysis, while the control group (GC) did not use any tools (routine care). Four to eight weeks after application of the tool, the benefits of the optimization measures to reduce or mitigate complexity of drug treatment were evaluated from the patient perspective. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients regularly using more than five drugs could be included for analysis. GP suggested 117 optimization measures in GI_with, 83 in GI_without, and 2 in GC. Patients in GI_with were more likely to rate an optimization measure as helpful than patients in GI_without (IRR: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.2-10.3). Thereby, the number of optimization measures recommended by the GP had no significant influence (P = 0.167). CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that an automated analysis considering patient perspectives results in more helpful optimization measures than an automated analysis alone - a result which should be further assessed in confirmatory studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered retrospectively at the German Clinical Trials register under DRKS-ID DRKS00025257 (17/05/2021).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Clínicos Gerais Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Prim Care Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Clínicos Gerais Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Prim Care Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article