Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Design and testing of the safety of the SARUS-CPR hood for novice resuscitators.
Wasik, P; McLeod, G A; Mountain, R; Watts, S; Briggs, H; Maini, N; Belford, I; McGuire, B; Brown, W; Clark, R; Eley, I; Richardson, E; Stonebridge, P.
Afiliação
  • Wasik P; Trainee Anesthetist, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • McLeod GA; Consultant Anaesthetist, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • Mountain R; Honorary Professor, 3042University of Dundee, UK.
  • Watts S; Consultant ENT surgeon, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • Briggs H; Trainee Anesthetist, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • Maini N; Trainee Anesthetist, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • Belford I; Consultant Anaesthetist, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • McGuire B; Trainee Anesthetist, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • Brown W; Consultant Anaesthetist, NHS Tayside, UK.
  • Clark R; 9536Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
  • Eley I; 9536Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
  • Richardson E; 9536Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
  • Stonebridge P; 59805Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Scott Med J ; 67(4): 189-195, 2022 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35818757
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Bystanders should be protected against aerosols, droplets, saliva, blood and vomitus during resuscitation after cardiac arrest The SARUS (safer - airway - resuscitation) CPR airway hood™ is a clear plastic cover and integrated mask that envelopes the head and torso. Our objectives were to test leakage using saline aerosol generation tests, then assess the performance of the hood during mock cardio-pulmonary resuscitation on a manikin. METHODS: A checklist was validated by comparing the performance of 10 novices against 10 experts during mock resuscitation. Thereafter, 15 novices were tested with and without the hood, in a randomised cross-over study, one week apart. RESULTS: Laboratory analysis showed a > 99% reduction of saline particles detected 5 cm, 75 cm and 165 cm above volunteers wearing the hood. On manikins, experts scored better compared to novices, 8.5 (0.7) vs 7.6 (1.2), difference (95%CI) 0.9 (0.4-1.3), P = 0.0004. Novice performance was equivalent using the hood and standard equipment, 7.3 (1.4) vs 7.3 (1.1) respectively, difference (90%CI) 0.0 (-0.3 - 0.3), P = 0.90. CONCLUSION: Aerosol transmission reduced in the breathing zone. Simulated resuscitation by novices was equivalent with and without the hood.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reanimação Cardiopulmonar / Parada Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Scott Med J Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reanimação Cardiopulmonar / Parada Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Scott Med J Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article