Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical outcomes of image-guided percutaneous drainage of pericardial effusion in cancer patients: A single-center retrospective analysis.
Hasegawa, Tetsuya; Arai, Yasuaki; Sone, Miyuki; Sugawara, Shunsuke; Itou, Chihiro; Wada, Shinji; Umakoshi, Noriyuki; Kubo, Takatoshi; Kimura, Shintaro; Kusumoto, Masahiko.
Afiliação
  • Hasegawa T; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Arai Y; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Sone M; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Sugawara S; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Itou C; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Wada S; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Umakoshi N; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kubo T; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kimura S; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kusumoto M; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol ; 19(1): 257-262, 2023 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35831984
AIM: Catheter removal, survival, and recurrence rates after percutaneous pericardial effusion drainage in cancer patients are not fully understood. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of image-guided percutaneous pericardial effusion drainage in cancer patients. METHODS: From January 2014 to September 2017, 113 percutaneous drainages for symptomatic pericardial effusion were performed in 100 cancer patients (median 60 years; range, 7-84 years) using ultrasound or angio-computed tomography. An 8-Fr drainage catheter was placed using the Seldinger technique via the subxiphoid (n = 73), apical (n = 23), or left parasternal (n = 17) routes. Success rates, complications, and postprocedural clinical outcomes of drainages were retrospectively assessed. RESULTS: The technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 99%, respectively, without major complications. The median duration of catheterization and evacuated pericardial effusion volume were 6 days (range, 1-72 days) and 970 ml (range, 140-7635 ml), respectively. Catheters were removed after the first drainage in 86 cases (86%). Symptomatic pericardial effusion recurred in nine patients after catheter removal, in whom redrainages were performed 13 times with a median duration to redrainage time of 48 days (range, 13-529 days). During the follow-up period (median 106 days [range, 1-1396 days]), 61 patients died. The median survival was 140 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 95-276 days), and the median catheter-free survival was 111 days (95% CI, 60-152 days). CONCLUSIONS: Image-guided percutaneous pericardial effusion drainage for cancer patients is safe and helps alleviate symptoms. Additionally, catheter removal is possible in most patients, allowing a catheter-free period for patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Derrame Pericárdico / Neoplasias Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Asia Pac J Clin Oncol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Derrame Pericárdico / Neoplasias Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Asia Pac J Clin Oncol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article