Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix for Two-Staged Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: An Institutional Experience.
Luo, Jessica; Willis, Rhett N; Ohlsen, Suzanna M; Piccinin, Meghan; Moores, Neal; Kwok, Alvin C; Agarwal, Jayant P.
Afiliação
  • Luo J; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Willis RN; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Ohlsen SM; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Piccinin M; Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan.
  • Moores N; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Kwok AC; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Agarwal JP; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Arch Plast Surg ; 49(2): 166-173, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35832668
ABSTRACT
The introduction of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) to breast reconstruction has allowed surgeons to reexplore the prepectoral implant placement technique in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Our institution adopted a novel approach using meshed ADM to lessen the financial burden of increased ADM utilization with the prepectoral breast reconstruction. This is a retrospective, single-center review of two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction using meshed human-derived ADM for anterior prosthesis coverage. Patient demographics, oncologic data, perioperative characteristics, and complications were examined and reported as means with standard deviations. Cost-saving with the meshed technique was evaluated. Forty-eight patients (72 breasts) with a mean age of 48.5 ± 15.0 years (range 26-70 years) were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 13.2 ± 4.4 months (range 4.1-25.8 months). Nineteen breasts (24.6%) experienced complications, with seromas being the most common complication (12.5%, n = 9). Expander removal and reoperation occurred at a rate of 8.3 and 9.7%, respectively. The average time to drain removal was 18.8 ± 6.6 days (range 8-32 days). Meshed ADM provided an average cost savings of $6,601 for unilateral and $13,202 for bilateral reconstructions. Our study found that human-derived meshed ADM can be safely used in two-staged prepectoral tissue expander-based breast reconstruction and can result in significant cost savings.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Arch Plast Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Arch Plast Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article