Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antimicrobial Stewardship in Public-Sector Hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Chetty, Sarentha; Reddy, Millidhashni; Ramsamy, Yogandree; Dlamini, Vusi C; Reddy-Naidoo, Rahendhree; Essack, Sabiha Y.
Afiliação
  • Chetty S; Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
  • Reddy M; Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Westville Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa.
  • Ramsamy Y; Essential Medicine Consulting, Durban 4400, South Africa.
  • Dlamini VC; Department of Medical Microbiology, Prince Mshiyeni Memorial Hospital-National Health Laboratory Services, Antimicrobial Research Unit, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa.
  • Reddy-Naidoo R; Pharmaceutical Services, Department of Health, Kwazulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 3201, South Africa.
  • Essack SY; Pharmaceutical Services, Department of Health, Kwazulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 3201, South Africa.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 11(7)2022 Jun 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35884134
ABSTRACT
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious global public-health threat. Evidence suggests that antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is a valuable tool to facilitate rational antibiotic use within healthcare facilities. A cross-sectional situational analysis using a questionnaire was conducted to determine the current status of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities in all public-sector hospitals in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN). The survey had a 79% (57, N = 72) response rate. A total of 75% of hospitals had an antimicrobial stewardship committee (AMSC), 47% (20, N = 43) had a formal written statement of support from leadership, and 7% (3, N = 43) had budgeted financial support. Only 37% (16, N = 43) had on-site or off-site support from a clinical microbiologist, and 5% (2, N = 43) had an on-site infectious disease (ID) physician. Microbiologist input on pathogen surveillance data (aOR 5.12; 95% CI 4.08-22.02; p-value = 0.001) and microbiological investigations prior to the commencement of antibiotics (aOR 5.12; 95% CI 1.08-42.01; p-value = 0.041) were significantly associated with having either on- or off-site microbiology support. Respondents that had a representative from microbiology on the AMSC were significantly associated with having and interrogating facility-specific antibiograms (P = 0.051 and P = 0.036, respectively). Those facilities that had access to a microbiologist were significantly associated with producing an antibiogram (aOR 4.80; 95% CI 1.25-18.42; p-value = 0.022). Facilities with an ID physician were significantly associated with having a current antibiogram distributed to prescribers within the facility (P = 0.010) and significantly associated with sending prescribers personalized communication regarding improving prescribing (P = 0.044). Common challenges reported by the facilities included suboptimal hospital management support; a lack of clinicians, pharmacists, nurses, microbiologists, and dedicated time; the lack of a multidisciplinary approach; low clinician buy-in; inadequate training; a lack of printed antibiotic guidelines; and financial restrictions for microbiological investigations. The survey identified the need for financial, IT, and management support. Microbiology and infectious disease physicians were recognized as scarce human resources.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Antibiotics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Antibiotics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article