Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intraoperative In Vivo Imaging Modalities in Head and Neck Cancer Surgical Margin Delineation: A Systematic Review.
Young, Kurtis; Ma, Enze; Kejriwal, Sameer; Nielsen, Torbjoern; Aulakh, Sukhkaran S; Birkeland, Andrew C.
Afiliação
  • Young K; John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
  • Ma E; John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
  • Kejriwal S; John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
  • Nielsen T; John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
  • Aulakh SS; School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95817, USA.
  • Birkeland AC; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA 95817, USA.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(14)2022 Jul 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35884477
ABSTRACT
Surgical margin status is one of the strongest prognosticators in predicting patient outcomes in head and neck cancer, yet head and neck surgeons continue to face challenges in the accurate detection of these margins with the current standard of care. Novel intraoperative imaging modalities have demonstrated great promise for potentially increasing the accuracy and efficiency in surgical margin delineation. In this current study, we collated and analyzed various intraoperative imaging modalities utilized in head and neck cancer to evaluate their use in discriminating malignant from healthy tissues. The authors conducted a systematic database search through PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost (CINAHL). Study screening and data extraction were performed and verified by the authors, and more studies were added through handsearching. Here, intraoperative imaging modalities are described, including optical coherence tomography, narrow band imaging, autofluorescence, and fluorescent-tagged probe techniques. Available sensitivities and specificities in delineating cancerous from healthy tissues ranged from 83.0% to 100.0% and 79.2% to 100.0%, respectively, across the different imaging modalities. Many of these initial studies are in small sample sizes, with methodological differences that preclude more extensive quantitative comparison. Thus, there is impetus for future larger studies examining and comparing the efficacy of these intraoperative imaging technologies.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article