Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of pharmacist interventions provided in the emergency department on quality use of medicines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Atey, Tesfay Mehari; Peterson, Gregory M; Salahudeen, Mohammed Saji; Bereznicki, Luke R; Wimmer, Barbara C.
Afiliação
  • Atey TM; School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia tesfaymehari.atey@utas.edu.au.
  • Peterson GM; School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Salahudeen MS; School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Bereznicki LR; School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Wimmer BC; School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Emerg Med J ; 40(2): 120-127, 2023 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35914923
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pharmacists have an increasing role as part of the emergency department (ED) team. However, the impact of ED-based pharmacy interventions on the quality use of medicines has not been well characterised.

OBJECTIVE:

This systematic review aimed to synthesise evidence from studies examining the impact of interventions provided by pharmacists on the quality use of medicines in adults presenting to ED.

METHODS:

A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. Two independent reviewers screened titles/abstracts and reviewed full texts. Studies that compared the impact of interventions provided by pharmacists with usual care in ED and reported medication-related primary outcomes were included. Cochrane Risk of Bias-2 and Newcastle-Ottawa tools were used to assess the risk of bias. Summary estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis, along with sensitivity and sub-group analyses.

RESULTS:

Thirty-one studies involving 13 242 participants were included. Pharmacists were predominantly involved in comprehensive medication review, advanced pharmacotherapy assessment, staff and patient education, identification of medication discrepancies and drug-related problems, medication prescribing and co-prescribing, and medication preparation and administration. The activities reduced the number of medication errors by a mean of 0.33 per patient (95% CI -0.42 to -0.23, I2=51%) and the proportion of patients with at least one error by 73% (risk ratio (RR)=0.27, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.40, I2=85.3%). The interventions were also associated with more complete and accurate medication histories, increased appropriateness of prescribed medications by 58% (RR=1.58, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.06, I2=95%) and quicker initiation of time-critical medications.

CONCLUSION:

The evidence indicates improved quality use of medicines when pharmacists are included in ED care teams. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020165234.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Farmacêuticos / Erros de Medicação Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med J Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Farmacêuticos / Erros de Medicação Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med J Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article